Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Thigh gaps and filtered snaps: a qualitative study exploring opportunities to mitigate social media harm through
Pranita Shrestha1, Jue Xie2, Pari Delir Haghighi1
1Department of Human-Centred Computing, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Background:
The ubiquity of social media has increased exposure to idealised beauty standards, often unrealistic and harmful. Repeated exposure has been linked to body dissatisfaction, harmful behaviours, and potentially the development of eating disorders (ED). Given the volume of content produced daily, effective harm mitigation strategies (automated or user-driven) are essential, requiring an informed understanding of the contexts and nuances surrounding harmful content.
Objective:
The study has two key aims: (1) to understand the perspectives of experts by profession and people with lived experience of ED, on what makes social media content harmful in the context of body image and ED, including why and how this harm occurs; and (2) to explore how technology might help mitigate these effects.
Methods:
We engaged n = 30 participants, including 12 interviews with experts by profession (n = 2 ED support service providers and n = 10 body image and ED experts), and five focus groups with experts by lived experience (n = 18 people with lived experience of ED).
Results:
Using the Framework Method guided by inductive thematic analysis, we developed six prominent themes: (1) Spectrum of harmful and ambiguous content on social media, (2) The "echo chamber" of harmful content amplified by social media algorithms, (3) Balancing safety, freedom and responsibility in social media moderation, (4) Shared responsibility and collaboration for safer social media environments, (5) The role of representation and diversity in social media recovery and support, and (6) Harnessing digital innovation to reduce harm on social media. We developed an eight-category framework of harmful social media content, offering an underlying contextual understanding of harmful content and guidance for harm-reducing technologies.
Conclusions:
Manual safeguards place significant responsibility on users. This work supports informed distinctions between harmful, ambiguous and safe content and provides design insights for classification systems and adaptable automated moderation.
Related Concept Videos
Binge Eating Disorders
Social Traps
Social Anxiety Disorder
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Proof
Social Scripts

