Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Review of Ultrasound Parameters for Predicting Difficult Airways
Published on: April 7, 2023
Direct comparison of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter and controlled attenuation parameter for steatosis using
Kento Imajo1,2,3, Hidenori Toyoda4, Satoshi Yasuda4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Purpose:
Hepatic steatosis, which is associated with liver diseases and adverse clinical outcomes, requires accurate, noninvasive diagnostic methods because of the limitations of liver biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP), a novel technique for assessing hepatic steatosis, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard.
Methods:
A total of 255 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent CAP, UGAP, and MRI-PDFF were prospectively enrolled from three liver centers in Japan. Using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, cutoff values for UGAP were determined according to steatosis grades based on MRI-PDFF. To minimize overfitting, diagnostic performance was validated using five-fold cross-validation.
Results:
CAP and UGAP values followed normal distributions, whereas PDFF values deviated from normality and were therefore log-transformed, yielding the variable MRI-logPDFF. CAP and UGAP demonstrated significant correlations with MRI-logPDFF, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.696 and 0.797, respectively. For MRI-PDFF-based grading, the AUROC (95% confidence interval) values of CAP and UGAP were 0.878 (0.813-0.923) versus 0.926 (0.867-0.960) for S0 versus S1-S3 (P=0.041), 0.820 (0.763-0.865) versus 0.908 (0.861-0.940) for S0-S1 versus S2-S3 (P<0.001), and 0.863 (0.811-0.902) versus 0.897 (0.852-0.930) for S0-S2 versus S3 (P=0.128), respectively. The validation analysis produced results consistent with those of the primary cohort.
Conclusion:
UGAP showed greater diagnostic accuracy than CAP for hepatic steatosis, notably in detecting grades ≥S1 and ≥S2.
Related Concept Videos
Transcription Attenuation in Prokaryotes
There are several different mechanisms used to attenuate transcription. In ribosome mediated...
Wave Parameters
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) Infrared Spectroscopy: Overview
The ATR process begins by directing a beam...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Miscellaneous Pharmacokinetic Parameters
One key aspect of the noncompartmental approach is determining a drug's total clearance. This can be done by dividing the drug dose by the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity. The area under the concentration-time curve represents the drug's...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

