Efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective cohort study with propensity-score matching
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Development of Compendium for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 12, 2024
Shifa Zhang1,2, Anhao Hu3, Jiuhe Sun2
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Background:
This study compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Methods:
In this prospective controlled trial (2020-2025), 623 stage II-IIIB ESCC patients were included; 192 received nICT (cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, sintilimab) before surgery, and 431 underwent direct surgery. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and overlap weighting were used to adjust for baseline confounders.
Results:
After PSM (144 pairs), the nICT group showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.31, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.42, p=0.002) compared to the upfront surgery group. The nICT group also had higher 1-/3-year PFS (88.8%/84.3% vs. 68.1%/52.8%) and OS rates (94.8%/84.7% vs. 89.6%/65.2%). Sensitivity analysis using overlap weighting confirmed these robust findings (PFS: HR = 0.37, p<0.001; OS: HR = 0.62, p=0.033).
Conclusions:
For locally advanced ESCC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy significantly improves both PFS and OS compared to upfront surgery, establishing it as a highly effective treatment strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

