Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life
Published on: January 9, 2017
Comparative evaluation of three automated urine sediment analyzers excluding cutoff-related trade-offs
Jinho Lee1, Heekang Choi1, Hanmil Jang1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract:
Performance comparison of automated urine sediment analyzers is difficult due to cutoff-related trade-offs. In this study, we evaluated and compared UF-5000, UAS800, and Cobas u701 using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A total of 774 urine samples were analyzed using manual microscopic examination and microbial culture as the reference test. The area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) was compared using DeLong's test. UF-5000, a flow cytometry analyzer, demonstrated significantly better performance than both the automated imaging analyzers UAS800 and Cobas u701 for detecting significant bacteriuria or mucous thread. However, its performance was significantly worse for detecting crystals. UAS800 and Cobas u701 showed generally similar performance, but with significant differences for detecting red blood cells, sperm, and significant bacteriuria. Our results highlight the operating mechanism as a key determinant of performance, and also show that analyzers with similar operating mechanisms can still have significant differences in their performance.
Related Concept Videos
Filtration and Urine Formation
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Physiology of Urine Formation
Glomerular Filtration
The first stage in urine formation is glomerular filtration. Each kidney contains approximately 1 million nephrons, the functional units of filtration, with a...
Formation of Concentrated Urine
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Formation of Dilute Urine
Filtrate Osmolarity in the PCT
Initially, as the filtrate passes through the proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), its...

