Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Covalent Bonds01:29

Covalent Bonds

160.5K
Overview
160.5K
Covalent Bonds01:08

Covalent Bonds

10.1K
Overview
When two atoms share electrons to complete their valence shells, they create a covalent bond. An atom's electronegativity—the force with which shared electrons are pulled towards an atom—determines how the electrons are shared. Molecules formed with covalent bonds can be either polar or nonpolar. Atoms with similar electronegativities form nonpolar covalent bonds; the electrons are shared equally. Atoms with different electronegativities share electrons unequally,...
10.1K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.9K
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

16.1K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.1K
Competition02:34

Competition

24.4K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
24.4K
Metal-Ligand Bonds02:51

Metal-Ligand Bonds

24.1K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
24.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3D point cloud driven organ semantic segmentation to assess maize structural responses along the planting-density gradient.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Prostaglandin Administration and Outcomes in Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery·2026
Same author

Scaling covalent ligand discovery through dynamic combinatorial library-versus-proteome screening.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Comparative Interactome Profiling of Itaconate and α-Ketoglutarate by the Peptide-Centric Local Stability Assay.

ACS chemical biology·2026
Same author

Quantitative RNA pseudouridine landscape reveals dynamic modification patterns and evolutionary conservation across bacterial species.

eLife·2026
Same author

Analysis of the Value of Combined Detection of Serum miR-302a-3p and Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in the Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease.

Lipids·2026
Same journal

Switching Site Selectivity in Alkoxyamine Hydration: From Lone-Pair Direction to Solvent Network Dominance.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

A Topotactic Leap: 2D Layers to 3D Large-Pore Zeolite.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution over Single-Atom Catalysts via Electrostatic Polarization in Contact-electro-catalysis.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Tumor Acidity-Activatable Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Selective Oncolytic Therapy.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Alternating Magnetic Field Promotes Ammonia Cracking by Disrupting the Sabatier Limitation of Ruthenium Catalytic Species.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Bulk Ferromagnetic Icosahedral Quasicrystals without Rapid Quenching.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions
08:40

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions

Published on: March 14, 2016

20.1K

Group Competition Strategy for Covalent Ligand Discovery.

Zhihao Guo1,2, Yunzhu Meng1,2,3, Boyuan Zhao1,2

  • 1Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Journal of the American Chemical Society
|January 22, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new group competition-based activity-based protein profiling (GC-ABPP) method allows direct comparison of multiple covalent ligands. This strategy screens ligand-protein reactivity for improved covalent ligand discovery.

More Related Videos

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.8K
Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
06:17

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions
08:40

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions

Published on: March 14, 2016

20.1K
Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.8K
Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay
06:17

Covalent Fragment Screening Using the Quantitative Irreversible Tethering Assay

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Chemoproteomics
  • Chemical Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is crucial for covalent ligand discovery.
  • Current ABPP methods indirectly assess ligand competition and lack head-to-head comparison.
  • Directly comparing ligand binding preferences across the proteome is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel chemoproteomic strategy for direct, proteome-wide comparison of multiple ligand binding affinities.
  • To establish a group competition-based activity-based protein profiling (GC-ABPP) method.
  • To enable iterative selection of high-affinity covalent ligands for specific protein targets.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a group competition-based ABPP (GC-ABPP) strategy using libraries of fully functionalized probes (FFPs).
  • Simultaneously labeled proteomes with probe subgroups to enable direct competition and affinity metric calculation.
  • Employed an iterative screening process with 65 FFPs to assess ligand-protein reactivity across >6000 cysteine sites.

Main Results:

  • Successfully implemented GC-ABPP for direct, proteome-wide comparison of ligand binding.
  • Identified high-affinity ligands targeting BCAT2 and UGDH after three rounds of screening.
  • Demonstrated the capability to screen multiple ligands against multiple proteins simultaneously.

Conclusions:

  • GC-ABPP provides a powerful paradigm for direct head-to-head comparison of covalent ligands.
  • This method significantly advances covalent ligand and drug discovery.
  • The strategy offers a scalable approach for identifying potent ligands against various protein targets.