Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides
Published on: May 20, 2019
Sulfidation Unlocks Dual Reductive Pathways in Uranium Immobilization by Iron Sulfide
Enyang Liu1, Zezhen Pan1,2, Xingxing Wang1,3
1Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Air Quality and Environmental Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Abstract:
Iron sulfide minerals are critical mediators of uranium (U) immobilization in anoxic environments, yet the electron transfer mechanisms across Fe- and S-containing phases remain incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that redox-driven structural transformations unlock a dual pathway for U(VI) reduction. Comparative experiments using pristine mackinawite (FeS), partially oxidized FeS (O-FeS), and sulfur-enriched FeS (S-FeS) revealed that FeS and O-FeS reduce U(VI) primarily through oxidation of structural S(-II), whereas sulfidation-induced structural alterations in S-FeS activate otherwise inert Fe(II) as a coreductant, as evidenced by Fe(III) formation. This dual electron-transfer pathway shows pH dependence. At pH 6.5, U(VI) reduction to U(V)/U(IV) is nearly complete in S-FeS, while the reduction extent decreases to 34% at pH 8.5, due to the formation of a passivated surface layer rich in Fe(III) and sulfur that inhibits further electron transfer. These findings demonstrate that oxidation- and sulfidation-driven variations in FeS stoichiometry and structure regulate uranium reduction and immobilization pathways, with important implications for predicting the fate of redox-sensitive metal contaminants in dynamic subsurface environments.
Related Concept Videos
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
Structure and Nomenclature of Thiols and Sulfides
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Other Glycolytic Pathways

