Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Examining Changes in HRV and Emotion Following Artmaking with Three Different Art Materials
Published on: January 11, 2020
Pericardiectomy for Constrictive and Recurrent Pericarditis: State of the Art Update
Kristina Krzelj1, Maria Bakaeen1, Tom Kai Ming Wang2
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Insights
Radical or complete pericardiectomy is recommended over partial resection for constrictive and recurrent pericarditis to prevent symptom recurrence. Advanced imaging and cardiopulmonary bypass aid surgical planning and execution for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Pericardial Disease
Background:
- Constrictive and recurrent pericarditis pose significant clinical challenges.
- Surgical management, particularly pericardiectomy, is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To offer a contemporary surgical perspective on managing constrictive and recurrent pericarditis.
- To review current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for pericardiectomy.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on surgical approaches to pericarditis.
- Analysis of diagnostic modalities including cardiac MRI, echocardiography, and heart catheterization.
- Evaluation of different pericardiectomy techniques (partial vs. radical/complete).
Main Results:
- Radical or complete pericardiectomy via median sternotomy is preferred over partial resection to minimize recurrence risk.
- Cardiopulmonary bypass can enhance the safety and completeness of pericardiectomy.
- Intraoperative challenges include low cardiac output syndrome, tricuspid regurgitation, and coronary injury.
- A multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers is vital for optimal results.
Conclusions:
- Complete pericardiectomy is advised over partial to prevent symptom or constriction recurrence.
- Further research is needed to determine the optimal timing and extent of pericardiectomy.
Purpose Of Review:
This review provides a contemporary surgical view on constrictive and recurrent pericarditis.
Recent Findings:
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and heart catheterization are complementary tools for diagnosis and management of patients considered for pericardiectomy. Radical pericardiectomy, unlike total/complete, represents the most extensive resection. Radical or total/complete pericardiectomy via median sternotomy is preferred over partial for both recurrent and constrictive pericarditis, to minimize the risk of symptoms and/or constriction recurrence. Utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass may facilitate the completeness and safety of the procedure. In surgical planning, attention should be paid to intraoperative challenges, especially low cardiac output syndrome, tricuspid regurgitation, and coronary injury. A multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers is essential to optimize outcomes. Radical or complete pericardiectomy is advised over partial to avoid the symptoms or constriction recurrence owing to the remaining pericardium. Further research is mandatory to identify the optimal timing and precise extent of pericardiectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Schemas
Tonicity in Plants

