Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
Published on: January 27, 2018
Selective peripheral denervation for refractory cervical dystonia: a single-center retrospective analysis of 160
Damiano G Barone1,2, Ken Porche2, Kirsten M Hayford2
11Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Objective:
Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia, characterized by abnormal head postures and pain, often refractory to botulinum toxin therapy. Selective peripheral denervation (SPD) remains a key surgical option, but long-term outcomes in large cohorts are underreported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of SPD in patients with botulinum toxin-refractory CD, focusing on symptom severity, pain, and head posture improvement.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 160 adults (mean ± SD age 54 ± 12.0 years, 46% male) with refractory CD who underwent SPD at a single center by a single surgeon from January 2005 to July 2023. Outcomes were assessed using subjective clinical measures and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), which was calculated retrospectively from clinical records. The modified Bertrand technique involved selective denervation and myotomies tailored to each patient's dystonic pattern. TWSTRS scores were analyzed at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and final follow-up (mean ± SD 10.3 ± 9.0 months). Time to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (≥ 12-point TWSTRS drop) was evaluated with covariate-adjusted Kaplan-Meier modeling (ever vs never revised, evaluated with the log-rank test) and a counting-process Cox model with revision as a time-dependent covariate.
Results:
Among 160 patients (mean follow-up duration 21.6 ± 35.6 months), TWSTRS improved by 73.5% at 3 months and 61.3% at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Median time to MCID was 3.0 months for never revised patients versus 22.0 months for ever revised patients (log-rank chi-square statistic = 19.09, p < 0.0001). In a time-dependent Cox model, revision surgery was significantly associated with higher likelihood of achieving MCID (HR 2.31, p < 0.005). Pain relief and improved head posture were reported in over 50% of patients. Complications were minimal, and recurrence was observed in 4.2% of cases. Outcomes were consistent with or exceeded those reported in the literature with either SPD or deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Conclusions:
SPD is an effective and durable surgical option for refractory CD, significantly improving pain, posture, and quality of life. Although revision surgery delayed time to improvement, it significantly increased the likelihood of achieving meaningful clinical improvement. Overall efficacy aligns with the existing literature, reinforcing its role as a first-line surgical intervention. Further studies should explore strategies to enhance long-term outcomes and delineate the role of SPD relative to DBS.
More Related Videos
12:36Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry
Published on: June 26, 2018
06:31Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury
Published on: October 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Instantaneous Center of Zero Velocity
To analyze this, consider two points on the wheel: point A and point B. The absolute velocity of point B can be expressed as the vector sum of the absolute velocity of point A and the relative velocity of point B with respect to point A. To simplify this analysis,...