Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Perspectives and practices in pediatric cranial fixation
Michael M McDowell1, Amna Imran2, Benjamin E Leslie3
11Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Children's Hospital and Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey.
Insights
Pediatric neurosurgeons report frequent complications with cranial fixation, including skull fractures and lacerations. They desire improved technologies for safer pediatric neurosurgery and better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Surgery
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Cranial fixation is critical for pediatric neurosurgery.
- Complications like fractures, lacerations, and slippage are underreported in children.
- Current study addresses pediatric neurosurgeon perspectives on skull clamping risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify pediatric neurosurgeon perspectives on skull clamping risks.
- To understand current clamping practices and injury experiences.
- To gauge surgeon attitudes toward injury detection and prevention systems.
Main Methods:
- Anonymous 19-question survey distributed to 295 pediatric neurosurgeons.
- Survey targeted surgeons registered with American Board of Pediatric Neurological Surgery and/or American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons.
- Questions covered clamping practices, injury history, and technology perceptions.
Main Results:
- 64 (21.7%) responded; 48 (16.3%) completed the survey.
- High rates of annual complications reported: 31.5% skull fractures, 48.1% scalp lacerations, >70% clamp slippage.
- Surgeons desire new technologies for risk mitigation (73%) and injury detection (65%).
Conclusions:
- Significant challenges exist with pediatric cranial fixation.
- Real-time intraoperative monitoring technologies show promise for enhancing patient safety.
- Development of safer, more reliable cranial fixation systems is needed.
Objective:
Cranial fixation is essential to many neurosurgical procedures for ensuring patient head immobilization and optimal surgical outcomes. However, complications such as skull fractures, scalp lacerations, and clamp slippage remain underreported and understudied in the pediatric patient population. This study aimed to identify pediatric neurosurgeon perspectives on skull clamping risks and protocols.
Methods:
An anonymous 19-question survey was distributed to 295 pediatric neurosurgeons with an email address registered with the American Board of Pediatric Neurological Surgery and/or the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons. Questions addressed clamping practices, injury experiences, perceptions of current safeguards, and attitude toward injury detection and prevention systems.
Results:
Of the 295 pediatric neurosurgeons contacted, 64 (21.7%) responded, and 48 (16.3%) completed the full survey. The median age at which respondents reported clamping pediatric skulls without additional support was 2 years, and the median minimum clamping pressure was reported to be 40 pounds. Surgeons reported substantial variability in clamping practices, particularly in minimum and maximum pressure thresholds, often citing patient-specific skull thickness as a key determinant. Injury reporting revealed that 31.5% of respondents experienced at least one skull fracture annually, 48.1% reported at least one scalp laceration annually, and annual slippage or clamp loosening was reported by > 70% of respondents. Additionally, surgeons who provided preoperative counseling regarding clamping risks were more likely to experience related risks. Overall, these surgeons expressed dissatisfaction with existing clamping technologies, citing inadequate safeguards for both injury prevention and detection. Seventy-three percent of surgeons expressed eagerness to adopt technologies capable of mitigating risks, and 65% expressed eagerness to adopt technologies capable of injury detection. These findings highlight the burden of clamp-related complications in pediatric neurosurgery and an interest in the development of safer, more reliable cranial fixation systems.
Conclusions:
There are substantial challenges associated with the utilization of cranial fixation in pediatric patients. Exploring real-time intraoperative monitoring technologies may offer a promising avenue for improving patient safety and surgical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Carbon-dioxide Fixation

