Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
Published on: November 7, 2025
Groundwater-adapted FMOC-LC-MS/MS for glyphosate, glufosinate and AMPA: EDTA-assisted preconditioning and application
Tomás M Mac Loughlin1, Marcos Navarro1, Marianela Ramos1
1Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente (CIM), FCEx-UNLP-CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract:
Glyphosate (GLY) and its main degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), together with the chemically related phosphinic acid herbicide glufosinate (GLU), are widely used agrochemicals. Their reliable quantification in groundwater remains analytically challenging due to complexation with divalent cations and matrix-dependent ionization. This work developed and validated a groundwater-adapted LC-MS/MS method using FMOC derivatization and isotopically labeled glyphosate (GLY*) as internal standard. The new protocol (SUBTE, from SUBTERRANEAN) introduces an acidification in the presence of excess EDTA to disrupt metal complexes prior to derivatization and was benchmarked against a conventional borate-buffer workflow (BORAX). Normalized calibration (analyte/GLY*) was linear from 0.5 to 20 µg·L-1 (R2 ≥ 0.99) and origin-compatible. Operational LOD/LOQ in matrix were 0.003/0.01 µg·L-1 for GLY, 0.01/0.04 for GLU, and 0.02/0.06 for AMPA, meeting precision criteria (≤20 % RSD at the lowest level). Across real groundwater samples spanning wide conductivity and Ca+2 + Mg+2 ranges (n = 50), SUBTE achieved mean recoveries of ∼96 % compared with ∼70 % for BORAX, demonstrating effective mitigation of divalent-cation artefacts and enhanced robustness in hard waters. No analyte exceeded the detection limit in any well at the time of sampling, consistent with the low-mobility, Ca-rich geo-pedologic setting of the Pampean plain. The SUBTE workflow thus provides a validated, matrix-resilient approach for routine monitoring of GLY, AMPA, and GLU in groundwater, ensuring reliable quantification under variable hydrogeochemical conditions.
Related Concept Videos
EDTA: Chemistry and Properties
EDTA: Conditional Formation Constant
For the equilibrium reaction of the metal with the...
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
EDTA: Direct, Back-, and Displacement Titration
Direct titration involves buffering the metal ion solution to the desired pH and directly titrating with standard EDTA until the endpoint. The optimum pH ensures a large conditional formation constant of metal−EDTA and visibility of the free indicator color in the solution. In addition, auxiliary complexing reagents are used to prevent the precipitation of metal hydroxides...
Complexometric EDTA Titration Curves
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...

