Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the exclusive breastfeeding social support scale: a cross-sectional study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Jilin Gao1, Wenyan Wang1, Bing Wei1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Background:
Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) contributes significantly to the physical and psychological health of both mothers and infants. Social support is a critical factor in maintaining EBF. However, there is a lack of validated instruments to assess the level of social support for EBF in China. To address this gap, this study aimed to translate the Exclusive Breastfeeding Social Support Scale (EBFSS) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity.
Methods:
The EBFSS was translated using the Brislin method and cross-culturally adapted. An expert panel review and a pre-survey were conducted to finalize the Chinese version. This cross-sectional study recruited 479 exclusively breastfeeding mothers between January and April 2025 through convenience sampling at four community hospitals in Hefei City. Validity was assessed using content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient, McDonald's ω coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability.
Results:
The Chinese version of the EBFSS consisted of 16 items across three dimensions: emotional, informational, and instrumental support. A total of 29 incomplete questionnaires were excluded, resulting in 450 valid responses for psychometric testing. The content validity of the items and scale levels ranged from 0.800 to 1.000 and 0.988, respectively; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracted three common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 69.539%; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed a good model fit (χ²/DF = 1.914, RMSEA = 0.064, CFI = 0.960, GFI = 0.907, TLI = 0.952, IFI = 0.960, TLI = 0.952). Correlation-related validity was 0.857 (p < 0.001). Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.931, McDonald's ω coefficient was 0.929, test-retest reliability was 0.936, and split-half reliability was 0.882.
Conclusion:
The Chinese version of the EBFSS demonstrates good reliability and validity and can be used to assess social support among mothers who exclusively breastfeed. This tool provides a scientific foundation for future study and targeted interventions aimed at improving EBF outcomes in China.
More Related Videos
08:57Quantification of Optic Nerve Cross Sectional Area on MRI: A Novel Protocol using Fiji Software
Published on: September 4, 2021
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Social Proof