Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Review of Ultrasound Parameters for Predicting Difficult Airways
Published on: April 7, 2023
Comparison of preprints and their corresponding peer-reviewed publications in the health field: a scoping review
Mohamad Sadek Zoghbi1, Amr Ali1, Lama Hamade1
1Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Background:
Preprints are becoming more common in the health sciences and allow for instant dissemination of research findings; however, with the risk of compromising quality and transparency. Peer review potentially improves reporting and reduces errors, although its actual impact is not known. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize evidence comparing preprints in the health areas to their peer-reviewed versions and assess preprint publication rates.
Methods:
We searched Embase, Medline OVID, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to July 2024 for studies comparing preprints with their peer-reviewed versions and/or investigating preprint publication rates. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and extracted data on study characteristics, parameters compared, and preprint publication rates. We conducted a narrative synthesis.
Results:
We included 40 studies (published 2019-2024; 92% peer-reviewed). The median number of studies analyzed per article was 356 (range: 19-73,256). 42% of preprints were eventually published among 33 studies that reported publication rates (IQR: 22%-67%). Preprint searches routinely started on January 1, 2020, with a median of 24.3 months and a median difference of 11.5 months between preprint and peer-reviewed search end dates. Commonly compared parameters were primary outcomes/endpoints (37%) and sample size (30%), with peer-reviewed articles showing improved reporting for funding (13%), conflicts of interest (13%).
Conclusion:
While peer review enhances transparency and methodological reporting (e.g., funding, conflicts of interest), the content, outcomes, and conclusions of health-related preprints remain largely consistent with their peer-reviewed versions. Preprints facilitate rapid knowledge dissemination but may benefit from stricter reporting standards to improve credibility. Future efforts should focus on standardizing preprint policies to bridge quality gaps without delaying access.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
The Scope of Physics
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...