Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Published on: March 26, 2015
The Effect of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Femoral Fixation Methods on Graft Failure Rates in Anterior Cruciate
Matthew Charles Johnson1,2, Ameer Tabbaa1, Jesse Galina1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Background:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction augmented with modified-Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (ACLR+LET) improves rotational stability of the knee in patients with a moderate to high risk of graft failure. Early biomechanical data suggest divergent pullout strengths among various LET fixation methods, but their clinical significance remains to be determined.
Purpose:
To evaluate graft rupture rates in ACLR+LET compared with ACLR alone, stratified by the method of LET femoral fixation.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL for studies that referenced Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Modified Lemaire. A meta-analysis was performed with a significance threshold of .05.
Results:
A total of 1199 studies were screened, and 17 met the final inclusion criteria. Across these studies, 2527 patients who underwent ACLR were analyzed; 1254 underwent ACLR with LET augmentation. LET augmentation significantly reduced graft rupture rates compared with ACLR alone (odds ratio [OR], 2.90 [95% CI, 1.89-4.46]). Among ACLR+LET subgroups, anchor fixation demonstrated the greatest reduction in graft failure (OR, 4.93; P < .001), followed by staple fixation (OR, 3.04; P < .001). Other fixation methods-including button, suture, and screw-showed potential benefit, but individual results were not statistically significant (P > .05). Further analysis revealed that LET significantly reduced graft failure in primary ACLR (OR, 3.44; P = .00). LET-specific hardware removal was rare (0.82% [95% CI, 0.07%-2.10%]), with the highest rates seen in staple fixation, followed by anchor, and no events reported in the button and screw groups (1.58% vs 1.10% vs 0% vs 0%; P = .702).
Conclusion:
ACLR+LET significantly reduces the risk of primary graft failure compared with ACLR alone. Among LET femoral fixation methods, anchor and staple fixation demonstrate the lowest ACL graft failure rates, with similar hardware removal rates.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
05:44Author Spotlight: Double Posteromedial Approach for Treating Posterior Cruciate Ligament Cysts
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...