Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Individualized Reconstitution of Human Milk Microbiota: A Feasible Approach in Real-World Settings
Published on: February 7, 2025
Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on individualized fortification of human milk
Meiying Quan1, Yu Zhang1, Lejia Zhang1
1Department of Pediatrics, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Insights
Individualized fortification (IF) in preterm infants improved early growth markers. However, no significant long-term health or developmental differences were observed compared to standard fortification (SF).
Area of Science:
- Neonatal nutrition
- Pediatric growth and development
- Clinical nutrition research
Background:
- Previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) on individualized fortification (IF) in preterm infants.
- Need to evaluate both short- and long-term outcomes of IF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the short-term (up to 2 years) and long-term (6-10 years) outcomes of preterm infants receiving individualized fortification (IF).
- To compare growth, development, and biochemical markers between IF and standard fortification (SF) groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of preterm infants from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) IF study.
- Data collection included medical records up to age 2 and long-term follow-up at ages 6-10 years.
- Comparison of growth parameters, biochemical indexes, lung function, cognitive scores, and metabolic profiles between IF and SF groups.
Main Results:
- Fifty-one infants completed 2-year follow-up; the IF group showed improved head circumference z-scores at 6 months, hemoglobin at 12 months, and weight z-scores at 24 months.
- Twenty-five children completed long-term follow-up.
- No significant differences were found in long-term lung function, cognitive scores, biochemical markers (ferritin, hemoglobin, IGF, 25-OH-vitamin D), bone age, or metabolic parameters (BMI, lipid profile).
Conclusions:
- Individualized fortification (IF) demonstrated benefits in early growth outcomes for preterm infants.
- No significant long-term health or developmental advantages were observed with IF compared to standard fortification (SF) up to age 10.
Background And Aims:
To evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants from a previous RCT on individualized fortification (IF).
Methods:
Preterm infants from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) IF study were enrolled. Data before age 2 were collected from medical records. Long-term follow-up was conducted at ages 6-10 years. Growth and development outcomes as well as biochemical indexes were compared between IF and standard fortification (SF) groups.
Results:
Fifty-one infants completed 2-year follow-up. The IF group showed significantly better outcomes in head circumference z-scores at CA 6 months (p = 0.035), hemoglobin at CA 12 months (p = 0.044), and weight z-scores at CA 24 months (p = 0.027). Twenty-five children completed long-term follow-up. No significant differences were found in lung function, cognitive scores, ferritin, hemoglobin, IGF, 25-OH-vitamin D, bone age, or metabolic parameters including BMI and lipid profile.
Conclusion:
PUMCH IF improved early growth outcomes, but no significant long-term health differences were observed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

