Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on individualized fortification of human milk

Meiying Quan1, Yu Zhang1, Lejia Zhang1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Frontiers in Nutrition
|January 23, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Individualized fortification (IF) in preterm infants improved early growth markers. However, no significant long-term health or developmental differences were observed compared to standard fortification (SF).

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal nutrition
  • Pediatric growth and development
  • Clinical nutrition research

Background:

  • Previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) on individualized fortification (IF) in preterm infants.
  • Need to evaluate both short- and long-term outcomes of IF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the short-term (up to 2 years) and long-term (6-10 years) outcomes of preterm infants receiving individualized fortification (IF).
  • To compare growth, development, and biochemical markers between IF and standard fortification (SF) groups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of preterm infants from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) IF study.
  • Data collection included medical records up to age 2 and long-term follow-up at ages 6-10 years.
  • Comparison of growth parameters, biochemical indexes, lung function, cognitive scores, and metabolic profiles between IF and SF groups.

Main Results:

  • Fifty-one infants completed 2-year follow-up; the IF group showed improved head circumference z-scores at 6 months, hemoglobin at 12 months, and weight z-scores at 24 months.
  • Twenty-five children completed long-term follow-up.
  • No significant differences were found in long-term lung function, cognitive scores, biochemical markers (ferritin, hemoglobin, IGF, 25-OH-vitamin D), bone age, or metabolic parameters (BMI, lipid profile).

Conclusions:

  • Individualized fortification (IF) demonstrated benefits in early growth outcomes for preterm infants.
  • No significant long-term health or developmental advantages were observed with IF compared to standard fortification (SF) up to age 10.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.7K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
403
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K