Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
Frontal Sinus Fractures: An Evaluation of Injury Parameters and Operative Variables on Surgical Outcomes
George Cove1,2, Declan Hughes1,2, Christopher Zerafa1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London E1 1FR, UK.
Background:
Frontal sinus (FS) injuries carry high morbidity; however, currently, there is no universally agreed-upon treatment approach for frontal sinus and frontobasal trauma.
Objective:
This study sets out to evaluate surgical outcomes in frontal reconstruction, looking at how fracture patterns and operative variables impact complication rates.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study which identified a cohort of 137 patients between the years 2015 and 2022 who sustained frontal sinus fractures at a level one major trauma centre in Central London. The electronic patient record (EPR) and pre-operative computed tomography (CT) were analysed to assess the following factors: patient demographics, injury parameters, surgical technique, and complications. Statistical tests included Pearson's chi square for categorical variables/nominal data. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were also used to analyse continuous variables.
Results:
Overall, 12 of the 91 patients who were treated surgically had major complications (n = 12, 13.2%). In total, 5.5% (n = 5) had return to theatre (RTT) for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, 5.5% for infection and 2.2% (n = 2) for haematoma or bleeding. FS fracture complexity was predictive of RTT (p = 0.015) and CSF leak (p = 0.015). Frontobasal complexity was predictive of post-operative infection (p = 0.047). Neurosurgical operative involvement and cranialisation was predictive of post-operative infection, CSF leak, and RTT.
Conclusions:
Understanding risk profiles in the management of FS fractures is vital in order to help clinicians mitigate these risks and also to better educate patients, including during the consent process. Further research could look at the medical and social risk factors that increase complication rates in this patient cohort.
More Related Videos
15:11Surgical Fixation of Sternal Fractures: Preoperative Planning and a Safe Surgical Technique Using Locked Titanium Plates and Depth Limited Drilling
Published on: January 5, 2015
06:04Author Spotlight: Studying Clinical Characters and Epilepsy Outcomes After Frontal Disconnection in Patients with MOGHE
Published on: August 16, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias I: Sinus Arrhythmias
Types of Arrhythmias
Sinus Node Arrhythmias
Sinus Bradycardia: Originating from the sinoatrial (SA) node, sinus bradycardia involves slower impulses, resulting in a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). Causes include sleep, vagal stimulation, beta-blockers, hypothyroidism,...