Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling
Published on: February 3, 2014
Diagnostic utility of APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A retrospective case-control
Sevil Cicek1, Bilge Kapudere1, Yasemin Beyza Kaya Parspancı1
1Department of Perinatology, Goztepe Professor Dr. Süleyman Yalçın Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective:
To investigate the diagnostic utility of three non-invasive hepatic fibrosis indices-aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and FIB-5-in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), and exploratory analysis of neonatal outcomes.
Methods:
This retrospective case-control study included 217 pregnant women who delivered at Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, a tertiary care center affiliated with Istanbul Medeniyet University, between September 2018 and February 2024. The study population was divided into two groups: 105 women diagnosed with ICP and 112 pregnant women without ICP who served as controls. The diagnosis of ICP was based on clinical pruritus, elevated serum bile acid levels (>10 μmol/L), and abnormal liver function tests. Women with pre-eclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome, coagulopathy, hepatitis, multiple pregnancies, or other hepatic conditions were excluded. Laboratory parameters including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin, and platelet counts were used to calculate APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 scores. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U-tests for group comparisons and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses to determine the diagnostic performance of each score.
Results:
APRI and FIB-5 scores were significantly higher in the ICP group compared with controls, whereas FIB-4 showed a smaller between-group difference (P < 0.001 for APRI and FIB-5; P = 0.022 for FIB-4). ROC analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance for APRI (area nder the curve [AUC] = 0.902; cut-off = 0.39; sensitivity = 82%; specificity = 89%) and moderate performance for FIB-5 (AUC = 0.718; cut-off = -1.84; sensitivity = 67%; specificity = 70%). FIB-4 showed lower diagnostic value (AUC = 0.590). Elevated scores were also associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, increased rates of preterm birth, and greater need for neonatal intensive care.
Conclusion:
APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 are elevated in pregnancies affected by ICP and may serve as supportive, non-invasive markers reflecting hepatocellular stress and hepatic involvement. Among these indices, APRI showed the best diagnostic performance, FIB-5 demonstrated moderate discriminative ability, and FIB-4 had limited diagnostic utility. These indices may provide clinicians with additional information when evaluating hepatic dysfunction and may be associated with neonatal outcomes, although they are not validated prognostic tools. Prospective studies are warranted to further validate their clinical utility.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

