Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Rheumatic Heart Disease,
Mohamad S Alabdaljabar1, Abdullah Al-Abcha1, Mohamad Alkhouli1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is effective for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Patients with NVAF and either rheumatic heart disease (RHD) or cardiac amyloidosis (CA) face higher bleeding risks post-LAAO, while hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) shows no significant outcome difference.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a key stroke prevention strategy for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
- Limited data exist on LAAO outcomes in patients with comorbid hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), rheumatic heart disease (RHD), or cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of LAAO in patients with NVAF, stratified by the presence or absence of comorbid HCM, RHD, or CA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing LAAO from 2015-2023 using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse.
- Outcomes assessed included mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and bleeding events.
- Multivariable Cox models and subgroup analyses were employed to evaluate risks.
Main Results:
- Among 14,755 patients, those with NVAF and RHD showed increased non-gastrointestinal/intracranial bleeding (HR: 1.24).
- Patients with NVAF and CA exhibited higher risks for the composite endpoint (HR: 1.63), stroke/TIA (HR: 2.00), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 2.50).
- No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between patients with NVAF alone and those with NVAF and HCM.
Conclusions:
- Patients with NVAF and RHD or CA experienced elevated bleeding rates post-LAAO, suggesting a higher inherent bleeding risk.
- The study supports a potential role for LAAO in these complex patient groups, particularly given similar stroke/TIA rates.
- Outcomes for patients with NVAF and HCM did not differ significantly from those without HCM, but findings for HCM and CA require further investigation due to sample size limitations.
Background:
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an effective stroke- prevention strategy for selected patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, LAAO outcomes data in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), rheumatic heart disease (RHD), or cardiac amyloidosis (CA), are limited.
Objectives:
This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of LAAO in patients with NVAF, with and without comorbid HCM, RHD, or CA.
Methods:
Using OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a retrospective cohort of adult patients undergoing LAAO (2015-2023) was analyzed. Outcomes included mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and bleeding, with multivariable Cox models and subgroup analyses.
Results:
A total of 14,755 patients (mean age 76.5 ± 7.0, 43.7% female, median follow-up 1.4 [0.8-2.4] years) were included. Compared with patients with AF, patients AF + RHD had high risk of nongastrointestinal/intracranial bleeding events (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.04-1.49; P = 0.02), whereas AF + CA showed higher risk of composite endpoint (mortality, stroke/TIA, bleeding) (HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.17-2.27; P = 0.004), stroke/TIA (HR: 2.00; 95% CI; 1.13-3.54; P = 0.02), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.14-5.47; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with AF alone and those with AF + HCM.
Conclusions:
Patients with AF and either RHD or CA experienced higher bleeding rates following LAAO compared with those without these conditions, despite similar stroke/TIA rates in AF + RHD, suggesting a higher inherent bleeding risk and possibly further supporting a role of LAAO. Importantly, there was no difference in outcomes between patients with AF and HCM vs those without. Because of the small sample size, the results in HCM and CA cohorts are mainly hypothesis generating.
More Related Videos
03:45Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
09:16Isolation and Characterization of Cardiac Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Endomyocardial Bioptic Samples of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Published on: February 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies