Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
10% Lidocaine Versus 1% Diclofenac Spray in Radial Arterial Blood Gas Sampling: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Ibrahim Altundağ1, Sinem Doğruyol1, Burcu Genç Yavuz1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Background:
Radial arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling is a common but painful procedure essential for assessing critically ill patients. Effective pain control is vital for patient comfort and procedural success.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical 10% lidocaine and 1% diclofenac sprays versus placebo in alleviating pain during radial ABG sampling. We also explored perfusion index (PI) as an objective pain assessment tool.
Methods:
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in the emergency department. A total of 150 patients undergoing radial ABG sampling were randomly assigned to three groups: placebo (n = 50), 10% lidocaine (n = 50), and 1% diclofenac (n = 50). Baseline perfusion index (PI0) was recorded, sprays applied, and a 10-min waiting period followed. After ABG sampling, post-procedure measurements were obtained, including PI1 and pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Analgesic effects were compared based on VAS scores and changes in PI (ΔPI and %ΔPI).
Results:
The mean post-procedure VAS scores were 4.18 ± 2.09 (lidocaine), 4.80 ± 2.70 (diclofenac), and 4.90 ± 2.59 (placebo), with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.292). As a secondary finding, a moderate positive correlation was observed between VAS scores and %ΔPI (r = 0.379, p < 0.001). PI significantly decreased in all groups after ABG sampling, but no significant differences were observed among groups.
Conclusion:
Topical 10% lidocaine and 1% diclofenac sprays did not provide significant pain relief compared to placebo. Although a moderate correlation between VAS and PI was observed, further research is needed to establish PI's clinical utility.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06918340).
More Related Videos
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
03:26Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
The Placebo Effect
Random Sampling Method
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems
Two primary injection methods are used...
Blinding
Gas Exchange and Transport