Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Uropathogens and prognosis among patients with hospital-diagnosed acute pyelonephritis: insights from a 19-year
Lise Skovgaard Svingel1, Mette Nørgaard2, Christian Fynbo Christiansen2
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. lisskg@clin.au.dk.
Purpose:
The microbial aetiologies of acute pyelonephritis (APN) may change over time. We aimed to describe long-term trends in microbiological diagnostics and pathogen distribution in patients with hospital-diagnosed APN, and to characterise clinical outcomes by pathogens.
Methods:
We conducted a population-based, serial cross-sectional and cohort study of patients with hospital-diagnosed APN in North Denmark across three periods covering 2000-2018. National health registries were linked with microbiological data to describe temporal trends in microbiological diagnostics and pathogen distribution, and to provide a descriptive comparison of median length of stay (LOS) with interquartile range (IQR) and 30-day cumulative mortality with 95% confidence interval (CI) between Escherichia coli and non-E. coli APN.
Results:
We identified 5338 APN episodes among 4773 patients. The proportion with urine culture increased from 75.1% in 2000-2006 to 92.9% in 2013-2018, with a concomitant increase in the proportion with a positive urine culture from 44.4% to 56.7%. The median LOS declined by 2 days across calendar periods. E. coli remained the predominant pathogen with a prevalence in the range 77.3%-81.9%. Non-E. coli APN was more common in male, older, and comorbid patients, and was characterised by longer LOS (median 5 days [IQR: 3-8] vs. 4 days [IQR: 2-6]) and higher 30-day mortality (3.7% [95% CI 2.3%-5.2%] vs. 1.0% [95% CI 0.6%-1.5%]) compared with E. coli.
Conclusion:
Microbiological testing increased during the study period, and the pathogen distribution remained largely stable with E. coli as the predominant uropathogen. Non-E. coli infections were associated with slightly less favourable short-term outcomes.
Insights
Microbiological testing for acute pyelonephritis (APN) increased, with Escherichia coli remaining the primary cause. Non-E. coli infections showed less favorable short-term outcomes, highlighting the need for continued monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a significant kidney infection.
- Understanding the microbial causes and trends of APN is crucial for effective treatment.
- Long-term data on APN diagnostics and outcomes are essential for public health surveillance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze long-term trends in microbiological diagnostics for hospital-diagnosed APN.
- To describe the distribution of pathogens causing APN over time.
- To compare clinical outcomes, including length of stay and mortality, based on causative pathogens.
Main Methods:
- Population-based, serial cross-sectional and cohort study in North Denmark (2000-2018).
- Linked national health registries with microbiological data.
- Descriptive comparison of outcomes (length of stay, 30-day mortality) between E. coli and non-E. coli APN.
Main Results:
- Urine culture use increased significantly from 75.1% to 92.9%.
- Escherichia coli remained the predominant pathogen (77.3%-81.9%).
- Non-E. coli APN was associated with longer length of stay and higher 30-day mortality.
Conclusions:
- Microbiological testing for APN has increased, with stable pathogen distribution.
- E. coli is consistently the main uropathogen.
- Non-E. coli APN is linked to less favorable short-term clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
What is Population Genetics?

