Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Studying Effects of Cigarette Smoke on Pseudomonas Infection in Lung Epithelial Cells
Published on: May 11, 2020
Performance of smoking duration-based lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: a comparative modeling study
Pianpian Cao1, Koen De Nijs2, Justin Lee3
1Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Background:
Replacing the pack-year criterion for lung cancer screening with smoking duration has been proposed to reduce racial disparities in eligibility. However, no studies have evaluated the potential long-term benefits and harms of duration-based criteria. We conducted a comparative modeling study to evaluate the effectiveness of duration-based eligibility vs that from current guidelines and other alternative criteria.
Methods:
We used 3 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network models to evaluate the performance of duration-based screening with various smoking duration thresholds (15-40 years in 5-year increments) for the 1960 and 1970 US birth cohorts. We first examined age-specific eligibility patterns of duration-based strategies vs pack-year and risk-based criteria. We then evaluated the performance of different strategies, comparing the resulting number of screens, lung cancer deaths averted, life-years gained, false-positive screens, and overdiagnosed cases. We compared the strategies' efficiency using lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained per screen and the benefit-to-harm ratios using lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained per overdiagnosed case.
Results:
Risk-based criteria resulted in the most lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained but also in more overdiagnosed cases. Duration-based strategies with a 35-year cutoff achieved comparable lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained to current US guidelines and resulted in similar false-positive and overdiagnosed cases per screen. Duration-based scenarios with a 20-year cutoff required substantially more screenings but yielded only modest additional lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained, resulting in lower benefits per screen than current guidelines.
Conclusion:
Duration-based screening may be as efficient as current US guidelines. Given their potential to reduce disparities in eligibility shown in recent studies and simpler implementation, duration-based criteria warrant consideration.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Lung Capacity
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n +...

