Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Diagnosed After Birth-But Detectable Before? A Cohort Study of Prenatal Testing Potential
Allison Schartman1, Olivia Woods1, Leah Wetherill1
1Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Genome sequencing and exome sequencing offer high diagnostic yields for prenatal genetic testing. Current screening methods have limitations in detecting rare genetic conditions, suggesting a need to update guidelines for high-risk pregnancies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Prenatal Diagnostics
- Genomic Medicine
Background:
- Prenatal genetic testing is crucial for identifying genetic disorders in fetuses.
- Current screening guidelines, such as those from ACOG/ACMG, may not fully capture the spectrum of genetic conditions.
- Evaluating the diagnostic yield of various genetic tests is essential for optimizing prenatal care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic yield of different prenatal genetic testing strategies in infants with confirmed genetic diagnoses.
- To compare the effectiveness of genome sequencing, exome sequencing, chromosomal microarray analysis, NIPT, and carrier screening.
- To inform potential revisions of current prenatal genetic screening guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of infants with confirmed genetic diagnoses.
- Standardized genetic consultation and testing approach.
- Comparative analysis of predicted diagnostic yields for various prenatal genetic tools.
Main Results:
- Genome sequencing (96.9%) and exome sequencing (93.8%) demonstrated the highest diagnostic yields.
- Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and comprehensive carrier screening detected a higher percentage of diagnoses compared to ACOG-recommended methods.
- A significant proportion (62%) of single-gene conditions remained undetectable with current prenatal screening tools.
Conclusions:
- Prenatal exome or genome sequencing provides high diagnostic yields and a streamlined approach.
- Chromosomal microarray analysis may not be the optimal first-line test for all cases.
- Current prenatal genetic screening has limitations for rare genetic conditions, supporting guideline revisions, especially for high-risk pregnancies.
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...
Potential Energy
Standard Electrode Potentials

