Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
Published on: November 25, 2016
Enantioselective Determination of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants in Environmental Waters Using SPE and CE-MS/MS
Pol Clivillé-Cabré1, Francesc Borrull1, Carme Aguilar1
1Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Abstract:
The growing concern over drug abuse, particularly involving amphetamine-type substances (ATS), has led to their monitoring in environmental waters. These chiral compounds, commonly found in river water and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents, require analytical methods capable of enantiomeric discrimination, as their enantiomers can exhibit different pharmacological and environmental behaviours. A method based on capillary electrophoresis (CE) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was developed using a dual cyclodextrin (CD) system consisting of 0.1% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-CD and 0.1% γ-CD in the background electrolyte (BGE), which enabled baseline resolution of the target enantiomers of the ATS under study. Samples were pretreated with solid-phase extraction using a mixed-mode cation exchange sorbent, ExtraBond SCX. Samples of 100 mL for WWTP influent and 250 mL for river water and WWTP effluent were extracted and then eluted with 5 mL of 5% NH4OH in methanol. Recoveries ranged between 40% and 67% for all amphetamines studied, with detection limits between 0.1 and 0.8 µg/L. Analysis of environmental samples from the Ebre River and WWTPs in Reus and Tarragona (Catalonia, Spain) confirmed the presence of some of the target compounds. Both enantiomers of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) were determined in WWTP influents and effluents, whereas R-amphetamine was quantified in an influent sample. No target compounds were detected in the analysed river water samples. These findings demonstrate the potential of the developed chiral CE-MS/MS method for robust enantiomeric profiling in environmental waters, attributed to efficient separation based on differences in effective mobility (µeff), electroosmotic flow (µeo) and selective interactions with CD chiral selectors. The method showed moderate adherence to green analytical principles, achieving an AGREE score of 0.47. Its environmental advantages include the use of CE, minimal solvent consumption and non-toxic chiral selectors, offering a more suitable alternative to more traditional LC-based methods.
Related Concept Videos
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Types of Hormones
States of Water
Water freezes when the intermolecular forces are greater than the kinetic energy. Unlike most other substances, water is less dense in its solid state than in its liquid state. This is because each water molecule can form...
Water and Mineral Acquisition
Quality of Water
The Water Cycle

