Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Economic Evaluation of Tympanostomy Tube Placement
Keith D Brendes1, Chase Beckerman2, Andrew Ritchey2
1Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Insights
In-office tympanostomy tube placement significantly reduces costs for both private and public insurance compared to operating room procedures. This cost-effectiveness highlights the potential benefits of insurance reimbursement for in-office procedures.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Tympanostomy tube placement is a common pediatric procedure.
- Traditional placement occurs in the operating room (OR), incurring significant costs.
- In-office placement using single-use devices offers a potential alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the economic outcomes of in-office tympanostomy tube placement versus standard OR placement.
- To analyze cost differences across private and public insurance payers.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients undergoing in-office (CPT 69433) or OR (CPT 69436) tympanostomy tube placement.
- Comparison of financial data between insurance and date-matched patients from 12/1/21 to 3/1/24.
- Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (significance level of 5%).
Main Results:
- Significant reductions in total payments for in-office versus OR placement were observed for both private ($647.14 vs $6873.45) and public ($312.74 vs $2656.34) insurance.
- Insurance payments were also significantly lower for in-office procedures across both cohorts.
- Patient out-of-pocket costs for privately insured patients showed no statistically significant difference between the two methods.
Conclusions:
- In-office tympanostomy tube placement demonstrates substantial cost savings compared to OR procedures.
- These economic benefits are particularly pronounced for insurance companies.
- The findings suggest that insurance reimbursement policies should consider supporting in-office tympanostomy tube placement.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study is to compare the economics of in-office tympanostomy tube placement using single use devices versus standard placement in the operating room (OR).
Methods:
A retrospective chart review was completed for all pediatric patients who underwent in-office tympanostomy tube placement (CPT 69433) along with insurance and date matched patients with placement in the OR (CPT 69436) between 12/1/21-3/1/24. Financial data were compared among the public vs. private insurance cohorts using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with a two-sided significance level of 5%.
Results:
One hundred and thirty-six in-office patients were identified, 102 private versus 34 public, and compared with 136 insurance and date matched OR patients. The average total payment for both privately insured patients, $647.14 in-office versus $6873.45 in the OR, and publicly insured patients, $312.74 in-office versus $2656.34 in the OR, was statistically significant. The average insurance payment for both privately insured patients, $301.58 in-office versus $5445.73 in the OR, and publicly insured patients, $310.63 in-office versus $2258.65 in the OR, was statistically significant. For the patient payment, public insurance usually has 0 copay and is therefore excluded. The patient payment of the private insurance cohort, $308.30 in-office versus $670.61 in the OR, was not found to be statistically significant.
Conclusion:
As expected, this study demonstrates significant reductions in overall cost with in-office tympanostomy tube placement even with the added cost of single-use devices compared to the standard placement in the OR, particularly for insurance companies, suggesting the potential benefit of providing reimbursement for these devices.
Level Of Evidence:
N/A.
Related Concept Videos
Uterine Tubes
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Rise of Liquid in a Capillary Tube
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

