Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026
A Murine Tail Lymphedema Model
Published on: February 10, 2021
High-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles for preoperative lymphatic mapping for lymphedema with a
ShuFang Yuan1, LiPing Chen2, LanJing Wu2
1Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. ysfsue@aliyun.com.
Objectives:
Lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA) is an effective surgical treatment for lymphedema, which requires accurate identification of lymphatic vessels. Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography, the most common method for lymphatic mapping, cannot always successfully identify lymphatic vessels. We aimed to explore high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a reliable alternative for lymphatic mapping when ICG lymphography is not feasible.
Materials And Methods:
We performed combined HFUS and CEUS for lymphatic mapping on the patients who exhibited no obvious linear pattern on ICG lymphography. The inner and outer diameters and depths of the lymphatic vessels were measured. We subsequently evaluated the accuracy of US lymphatic mapping by comparing it with the operative results. And the postoperative volume and circumference of the affected limbs were compared with the preoperative measurements.
Results:
We recruited 111 patients with lymphedema, including 96 limbs and 24 perineal areas affected. Three hundred forty-five lymphatics in the limbs and 52 in the perineum underwent anastomosis and were analyzed. Comparable lymphatic vessel diameter (inner: 0.5-0.9 mm; outer: 0.8-0.9 mm) and depth (9-10 mm) measurements across HFUS, CEUS, and combined HFUS + CEUS. However, HFUS + CEUS significantly improved detection sensitivity, identifying 313 vessels (91.1% accuracy) vs 114 (88.6%) for HFUS and 22 (90.9%) for CEUS. Significant postoperative reductions in limb circumference (39.3 ± 7.4 cm to 37.8 ± 7.1 cm) and volume (8.23 ± 3.63 L to 7.52 ± 3.39 L, p < 0.001). All ultrasound methods consistently showed volume reduction (HFUS: 9.37 ± 2.93 L to 8.46 ± 2.01 L; CEUS: 9.46 ± 2.57 L to 9.09 ± 2.45 L; HFUS + CEUS: 9.30 ± 3.21 L to 8.07 ± 3.12 L, p < 0.001-0.002).
Conclusions:
High-frequency US combined with CEUS serves as a reliable pre-op lymphatic mapping alternative when ICG lymphography fails.
Key Points:
Question In over 40% of lymphedema patients, preoperative ICG lymphangiography fails to show a linear pattern; can HFUS and CEUS provide complementary information? Findings ICG failed to visualize in 42.53% of patients; HFUS and CEUS identified lymphatics in all and achieved 94.5% accuracy. Clinical relevance This study confirmed that HFUS combined with CEUS improves the detection of lymphatic vessels and the success of LVA in ICG-negative cases.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
01:15Development of the Lymphatic System
The first lymph sacs to form are the paired jugular lymph sacs located at the junction of the internal jugular and subclavian veins. From these sacs, lymphatic capillary plexuses extend to the thorax, upper limbs, neck, and head, eventually forming lymphatic vessels. Each jugular lymph sac maintains a...
01:21Frequency-dependent Selection
01:17Linear Circuits
01:22Introduction to Lymphatic and Immune System
The immune responses can be categorized into two types: innate and adaptive. Innate immunity comprises nonspecific defenses we are...
01:28Functions of the Lymphatic and Immune System
The primary lymphoid organs, including the bone marrow and the thymus, serve as the maturation sites for lymphocytes. Secondary lymphoid organs, like the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, activate these lymphocytes and serve as...