A global perspective on the accuracy of pediatric weight estimation methods in emergency care: A systematic review
Irrintzi Fernández-Aedo1, Sendoa Ballesteros-Peña2, Sandra Tobar-Cabrera3
1Biobizkaia Health Research Institute (IIS Biobizkaia), Plaza de Cruces s/n, Barakaldo, Bizkaia 48903, Spain; Nursing I department, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (EHU), Spain.
Insights
Accurate pediatric weight estimation is crucial in emergency care. Multivariable and locally validated methods are most reliable, but diverse global data necessitates tailored approaches for each emergency system.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate patient weight is critical in pediatric emergency services.
- Existing weight estimation tools exhibit biases and variable accuracy.
- A comprehensive evaluation of global pediatric weight estimation methods is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the accuracy and applicability of pediatric weight estimation methods worldwide.
- To identify the most reliable methods for use in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
- Inclusion of observational and validation studies (2010-2025) with original data.
- Searches conducted across major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest).
Main Results:
- Thirty-one studies from diverse global regions were analyzed.
- Two-dimensional and parental estimation methods showed higher accuracy, especially in overweight/obese populations.
- Significant heterogeneity in age ranges, error criteria, and validation approaches was noted.
Conclusions:
- Methods incorporating multiple anthropometric variables or local validation are most reliable.
- The uneven global evidence base highlights the need for localized validation.
- Emergency systems should tailor methods to local demographics and implement standardized validation.
Introduction:
In pediatric emergency services, it is essential to know the patient's weight, for which there are numerous estimation tools. However, these instruments present biases in calculating the patient's weight. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of pediatric weight estimation methods available worldwide, comparing their accuracy and applicability in medical practice.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA recommendations (PROSPERO Registration Number CRD420251174686). Observational and validation studies with original data published from 2010 to July 2025 were included. Articles were searched for in ProQuest, Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged 0 to 18 years, weight estimation methods, and quantitative reports of accuracy.
Results:
Thirty-one studies from all continents were selected. Two-dimensional methods were generally more accurate than those based solely on age or one-dimensional formulas, especially in populations with a high prevalence of overweight or obesity. Parental estimation also performed well. Heterogeneity was observed in age ranges, acceptable error and validation criteria between studies.
Conclusions:
Within the limitations of the uneven global evidence base, the tools that appear most reliable for estimating pediatric weight in emergency departments are those that incorporate more than one anthropometric variable or are supported by local validation. Given the scarcity of data from various regions and specific populations, each emergency system must determine the approach that best suits its local demographic profile, invest in staff training, and apply standardized validation criteria before adopting changes in routine practice.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Global Climate Change
Improving Translational Accuracy
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview


