Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
Published on: January 10, 2025
Gender inequality and adolescent bullying victimization among 69 countries and its effect modification by corporal
Mariko Hosozawa1, Naho Yamane2, Sumiyo Okawa1
1Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Bullying victimization among adolescents is a major public health concern, and its prevalence varies considerably across countries. While country-level economic factors are often cited to explain this variation, the roles of gender inequality and national legal frameworks remain underexplored.
Objective:
To examine the association between country-level gender inequality and bullying victimization among adolescents across 69 middle- and high-income countries and whether national laws prohibiting corporal punishment modify this association.
Participants And Setting:
Data were obtained from the Programme for International Student Assessment 2018, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 15-year-old students.
Methods:
The primary outcome was the victimization score, derived from six self-reported experiences of bullying victimization. Multilevel regression analysis was used to explore the association between the Gender Inequality Index (GII) and the outcome. We also analyzed effect modification by national laws prohibiting corporal punishment (no/partial; fully banned for ≤10 years; fully banned for >10 years).
Results:
The study included 433,836 students (50.6% female). Higher GII was associated with increased victimization (b = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.73 per one-standard deviation increase), explaining 35.6% of the country-level variance. This association was stronger for boys and was modified by corporal punishment laws. Compared to countries with no or partial prohibition, countries with full prohibition enacted for ≤10 years exhibited an attenuated association. This attenuating effect was not observed in countries with a full prohibition for >10 years.
Conclusions:
Reducing societal gender inequality and promoting the full prohibition of corporal punishment may be relevant strategies for mitigating adolescent bullying victimization, particularly for boys.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Scientific Laws and Theories
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Third Law of Thermodynamics
Second Law of Thermodynamics

