Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026
Direct Pressure Monitoring Accurately Predicts Pulmonary Vein Occlusion During Cryoballoon Ablation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Myocardial and Neural Damage due to Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Comparison of Pulsed Electric Field and Thermal
Predrag Stojadinović1,2, Nicoletta Ventrella1,3,4, Hana Alfredová1
1Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Background:
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using thermal energy-radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation (CRYO)-is associated with direct myocardial injury and collateral neural damage. In contrast, pulsed electric field (PEF) energy has emerged as a neural-sparing alternative. There is a lack of quantitative data on proportional neural damage resulting from individual ablation energies.
Objective:
To assess the impact of PVI by RF, CRYO and PEF on the release of plasma biomarkers of myocardial and neural damage.
Methods:
This study included 85 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI (age: 61 ± 12 years, 74% males). Ablation was performed with PEF in 32 patients, RF in 23, and CRYO in 30. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected before, immediately after PVI, and the day after the procedure to measure plasma levels of S100 binding protein (S100B), high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), and high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT). Groups were compared based on maximum biomarker levels and the (hsTnI/hsTnT)/S100B ratio as an index of cardioselectivity.
Results:
Following PVI, all energy modalities caused significant myocardial injury, with PEF showing the most pronounced effects (maximum hsTnT: 1476, 958 and 967 ng/L; maximum hsTnI: 12659, 1699 and 8109 ng/L; for PEF, RF and CRYO, respectively). Maximum S100B levels indicating the neural impact were highest in the CRYO group (80, 80 and 190 ng/L for PEF, RF and CRYO, respectively). PEF exhibited the greatest cardioselectivity, as indicated by the highest (hsTnI/hsTnT)/S100B ratio (0.11 ± 0.04, 0.02 ± 0.01 and 0.05 ± 0.05 for PEF, RF and CRYO, respectively). Interestingly, no correlation was observed between S100B release and heart rate acceleration (R = 0.07, p = 0.51).
Conclusion:
PEF is the most cardioselective modality of ablation energy currently available for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The neuromodulatory effect of PVI on the sinus node appears to be independent of the magnitude of neural damage.
Related Concept Videos
01:16Electric Field
In the new picture, imagine that the first charge sets up an electric field independent of all other charges in the universe. When another charge comes in its vicinity, the second charge experiences an electric force depending on the electric field at that point. The source charge does not...
01:24Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
01:12Determining Electric Field From Electric Potential
In general, regardless of whether the electric field is uniform, it points in the direction of decreasing potential because the force on a positive...
01:13Finding Electric Potential From Electric Field
01:25Electric Field Lines
The solution to this problem is to use electric field lines, which are not vectors but...
01:23Induced Electric Fields