Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

11:13
Porcine Model of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: November 21, 2019
9.8K
Retroperitoneal Abdominal Aortic Repair With the da Vinci Single Port System: A Porcine Model Feasibility Study
Toshio Takayama1, Hubert Stein2, Hideaki Obara3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
EJVES Vascular Forum
|January 26, 2026
Summary
Single-port robotic surgery using a retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic repair proved technically feasible in porcine models. This method shows potential for reducing complications compared to traditional open or laparoscopic surgeries.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Robotic surgery is underutilized in vascular surgery but shows promise for abdominal aortic repair.
- A standardized retroperitoneal approach (RPA) may decrease risks associated with transabdominal aortic repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish surgical techniques for robotically assisted infrarenal abdominal aortic repair.
- To evaluate the feasibility of a single-port retroperitoneal approach (RPA) for aortic repair.
Main Methods:
- Performed retroperitoneal abdominal aortic repair in four live porcine models.
- Utilized the da Vinci SP (single port) surgical system for the procedures.
- Recorded operating times for key procedural steps, including graft implantation.
Main Results:
- Feasible abdominal aortic repair via single-port RPA using the da Vinci SP system in all models.
- Efficient retroperitoneal access and docking (8-20 minutes).
- Reasonable anastomotic times (26-31.3 minutes) with successful outcomes in most models; one model experienced hemorrhage.
Conclusions:
- Single-port robotic aortic repair via RPA is technically feasible and accurate in porcine models.
- Reasonable anastomotic times and adequate surgeon comfort suggest potential for clinical translation.
- Further studies are needed to confirm clinical benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
43.6K
Overview
43.6K
Mismatch Repair
6.5K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
6.5K
Overview of DNA Repair
33.6K
In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Chemically...
33.6K
Base Excision Repair
26.3K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
The first step of...
26.3K
Nucleotide Excision Repair
40.8K
Overview
40.8K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
8.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.0K

