Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Standardization of Basket Use in Sialendoscopy: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study
Published on: June 6, 2025
The Saudi FDA drug evaluation timeline in comparison with international counterparts: a retrospective observational
Aljoharah M Algabbani1, Radwan Hafiz1, Bassam AlWon1
1Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Research Division, Executive Department of Research & Studies, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh, 13513, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
Regulatory agencies ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of pharmaceuticals, influencing patient access to novel therapies. The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) oversees drug evaluation in Saudi Arabia. This study evaluates SFDA's drug review times compared to other international agencies and assesses characteristics and approval timelines of novel drugs approved by the SFDA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019.
Methods:
A retrospective observational study analyzed drug evaluation times from the SFDA and six international agencies: FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Health Canada, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and Swissmedic. The primary outcome was drug approval timeline, defined as days from submission to registration. Data on 48 novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2019 were collected and tracked for SFDA approval status through 2024. Descriptive statistics compared drug characteristics and evaluation times. A regulatory comparison used publicly available documents and reported timelines.
Results:
SFDA and EMA showed shorter median approval times (∼6.5 months), while Swissmedic (14.5 months) and PMDA (10.6 months) had longer timelines. Among 48 FDA-approved novel drugs in 2019, 21 (43.75%) were approved by the SFDA by mid-2024; 23 (47.92%) were not submitted for SFDA review, impacting coverage. Small molecules dominated approvals for both FDA (58.33%) and SFDA (64%). Advanced therapies such as gene therapies and synthetic peptide analogs were absent from SFDA approvals, mainly due to non-submission. Median approval times were comparable (SFDA: 248 days; FDA: 243 days), with greater variability observed in SFDA timelines.
Conclusion:
SFDA's review timelines align with major regulatory agencies, supporting timely drug access. Further investigation into submission patterns and regulatory challenges may improve approval rates, especially for advanced therapies.
More Related Videos
15:27Internalization and Observation of Fluorescent Biomolecules in Living Microorganisms via Electroporation
Published on: February 8, 2015
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Internal Energy
Internal Energy