Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Outcomes of aortic and mitral valve replacement with Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis over 5-years: Dafodil™-1
Channabasavaraj Shivalingaiah Hiremath1, Anil Jain2, Anurag Garg3
1Sri Madhusudan Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Sri Sathya Sai Sarala Memorial Hospital, Sathya Sai Grama, Muddenahalli, Chikkaballapur, India.
Objectives:
The durability and performance of bioprosthetic valves are pivotal in managing valvular heart disease (VHD). This 5-year follow-up study evaluated the long-term clinical safety, haemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of the Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve replacement (AVR/MVR).
Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter, first-in-human trial conducted across 19 Indian centers, 136 patients with advanced VHD (67 AVR, 69 MVR) were enrolled. Key endpoints were evaluated over 5 years.
Results:
The mean age of the patients in the AVR and MVR cohorts was 60.2 ± 8.3 years and 49.7 ± 14.4 years, respectively. A total of 124 patients (61 AVR, 63 MVR) completed the 5-year follow-up. In the AVR cohort, mean pressure gradients decreased from 51.2 ± 24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.3 ± 5.3 mmHg at five years, while effective orifice area (EOA) increased from 0.88 ± 0.56 cm2 to 1.72 ± 0.52 cm2 (p < 0.001). In the MVR group, the indexed EOA improved from 0.68 ± 0.4 cm2/m2 to 1.28 ± 0.39 cm2/m2 (p < 0.001). Both cohorts exhibited significant improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and SF-12 QoL scores. There were no cases of haemolysis, structural valve deterioration (SVD), or myocardial infarction. At five years, the incidence of all cause of mortality was 9.8% in the AVR group and 22.2% in the MVR group. The major adverse cardiac event-free survival rates were 88.0% (AVR) and 76.7% (MVR).
Conclusions:
Over five years, the bioprosthesis demonstrated sustained haemodynamic performance, clinical safety, and QoL. The absence of SVD and low rates of adverse events encourage its use in young patients requiring surgical valve replacement. Furthermore, a long-term follow-up is warranted to evaluate its durability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

