Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome. Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Interdependence explains how and when crises impact social cohesion.

Communications psychology·2026

Same author

Cognitive computations underlying ritual performance and persistence.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

The longitudinal associations of material security and belief in God in young Americans.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026

Same author

Religious parents receive more alloparental aid in rural Bangladesh.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026

Same author

Investigating the causal effects of religiosity on childbearing among U.S. adolescents using a three-wave longitudinal design.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Three evolutionary radiations shaped the evolution of global religious diversity.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025

Same journal

Repeated insertions at positions 261-280 in KPC-2 highlight a ceftazidime-avibactam resistance hotspot.

iScience·2026

Same journal

ROS inhibits microtubule dynamics and cell growth heterogeneity during Arabidopsis sepal morphogenesis.

iScience·2026

Same journal

Type 1 diabetes alters early macrophage-<i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> transcriptional coordination during infection.

iScience·2026

Same journal

Association of estimated pulse wave velocity with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in multiple cohorts.

iScience·2026

Same journal

Effect of rolling surface texture on bearing friction pairs lubrication.

iScience·2026

Same journal

Whole blood exchange-lymphoplasmapheresis combined transfusion as an immunotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus.

iScience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Published on: August 20, 2007

Intuitive and deliberative processes underlying commitment signaling for cooperative assortment.

Martin Lang¹, Alexandra Ružičková¹, Katarína Čellárová^1,2

¹LEVYNA: Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.

|January 26, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Reliable commitment signals in humans are not intuitive. Deliberative cost-benefit analysis, not costly displays, best predicts cooperation, suggesting careful evaluation optimizes commitment signaling.

Keywords:

health sciences

More Related Videos

Blastomere Explants to Test for Cell Fate Commitment During Embryonic Development

Blastomere Explants to Test for Cell Fate Commitment During Embryonic Development

Published on: January 26, 2013

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Investigating the Immunological Mechanisms Underlying Organ Transplant Rejection

Published on: August 20, 2007

Blastomere Explants to Test for Cell Fate Commitment During Embryonic Development

Blastomere Explants to Test for Cell Fate Commitment During Embryonic Development

Published on: January 26, 2013

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Psychology
Behavioral Economics
Cognitive Science

Background:

Costly signaling theory posits that expensive signals demonstrate commitment, facilitating cooperation.
The cognitive mechanisms underpinning the reliability of these commitment signals remain poorly understood.
Distinguishing between intuitive and deliberative processes in signal reliability is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether intuitive processes or deliberative cost-benefit evaluations support reliable commitment signaling.
To examine the role of cognitive processing (time pressure vs. delay) in the effectiveness of costly commitment signals.

Main Methods:

Three studies involving 2,223 participants playing a public goods game.
Participants could send variously costly commitment signals under conditions of time pressure or time delay.
Analysis focused on how signaling decisions and subsequent contributions differed based on cognitive load and signal cost.

Main Results:

Under time pressure, only high-cost signals differentiated cooperators from selfish players, but did not reliably predict cooperation.
With time to deliberate (time delay), cooperators preferentially chose low-cost signals and contributed more to the public good.
Deliberative cost-benefit evaluation, rather than intuitive costly displays, proved more effective for reliable commitment signaling.

Conclusions:

Reliable commitment signaling in humans relies more on deliberative cost-benefit evaluation than intuitive attraction to costly signals.
Cooperators effectively optimize signal cost through careful consideration, enhancing the reliability of commitment displays.
Understanding the cognitive underpinnings of signaling is key to explaining cooperative assortment.