Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
Evaluation of a Co-Research Program: optimising engagement in research
Ashley Scott1, Sophie Rowland1, Aniqua Mehdi1
1Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Co-research methods enhance inclusion for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The DS-TO-THE-MAX program evaluation highlights the importance of relationships and accessible communication for successful research collaboration.
Area of Science:
- Health Research
- Disability Studies
- Community-Based Participatory Research
Background:
- Co-research methods are increasingly utilized to involve individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) in research.
- The DS-TO-THE-MAX Co-Research Program pairs co-researchers with Down syndrome and academic researchers for health research projects.
- This study evaluates the DS-TO-THE-MAX program's processes and outcomes to understand its effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the DS-TO-THE-MAX Co-Research Program's processes and outcomes.
- To identify facilitators and barriers to inclusive collaboration within the co-research team.
- To understand the experiences and perspectives of co-researchers with Down syndrome.
Main Methods:
- A logic model was developed to map program components and outcomes.
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven co-researchers with Down syndrome.
- A focus group was held with research assistants, and thematic analysis was used for data interpretation.
Main Results:
- Mutual recognition and diverse communication methods fostered engagement and team cohesion.
- Co-researchers' contributions were driven by personal interests and experiences, leading to perceived benefits.
- Accessible practices and self-advocacy were noted, though participants did not always identify as researchers; challenges included difficult vocabulary.
Conclusions:
- Relationships and co-researchers' lived experiences are crucial for successful research engagement.
- Co-research team evaluations provide a feasible approach to enhance inclusive collaboration for individuals with IDDs.
- Findings offer insights for improving co-research programs to maximize participation and value for all team members.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

