Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Climbing Defects in a Drosophila Model of Neurodegenerative Disorders
Published on: June 13, 2015
Climbing the gap: a review on sex differences in high-level rock climbing
Kaja Langer1, Andrea Roffler2, Pauline Hief1
1Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Sport Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
None:
Since its inclusion in the Olympic Program in 2016, climbing has grown increasingly popular and professionalized. While climbing research is also increasing, female (elite) athletes remain underrepresented, with the extent of this gap remaining unexplored. Therefore, the aims of this review are to (1) systematically review the published research in climbing, focusing on the inclusion of female athletes, (2) evaluate the differences between male and female climbers, and (3) formulate recommendations for future research and practice. A systematic literature search was performed in four databases in July 2025. In a general analysis, all included studies were analyzed regarding the representation of female participants. Peer-reviewed original studies assessing various factors of climbing performance in advanced to higher-elite climbers (speed, lead, and boulder-IRCRA minimum of 15 females and 18 males) were included. In a detailed analysis, studies specifically assessing sex-specific differences were categorized and analyzed with respect to these differences. A total of 246 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the general analysis. The results showed that studies in high-level climbing predominantly focus on male participants, both in terms of study design, with much more studies investigating isolated male athletes compared to females, and in participant distribution with only 22.7% female participants compared to male participants (66.5%). In addition, only 34 studies including sex-specific analyses were identified. The results demonstrate that male and female performance in the various climbing disciplines depend on different factors to varying degrees and reveal further important differences between male and female athletes. Our findings emphasize the need for future climbing research to focus on female athletes and further investigate sex-specific differences. Based on our findings, we propose recommendations to guide future research and practice.
More Related Videos
09:17Assessing Neurodegenerative Phenotypes in Drosophila Dopaminergic Neurons by Climbing Assays and Whole Brain Immunostaining
Published on: April 24, 2013
06:52An Automated Rapid Iterative Negative Geotaxis Assay for Analyzing Adult Climbing Behavior in a Drosophila Model of Neurodegeneration
Published on: September 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Sex-linked Disorders
Gap Junctions
Gap Junctions
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...