Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing a New Fluorescence-Based Protocol for In Vivo Mitochondrial Morphology Analysis in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: June 23, 2023
Drivers of Diagnostic Delay in Mitochondrial Disease: Missed Recognition of Canonical Features
Rory J Tinker1, Neil Jacob1, Mohammad Ghouse Syed2,3
1Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA.
Abstract:
Diagnostic delay is common in mitochondrial disease, and its drivers remain unclear despite advances in molecular diagnostics. We retrospectively analyzed 61 individuals with molecularly confirmed mitochondrial disease at the Mount Sinai Mitochondrial Disease Clinic, diagnosed after 2016. Diagnostic delay was partitioned into intervals from symptom onset to clinical suspicion, and from suspicion to molecular diagnosis. Demographic, phenotypic, and genetic data were abstracted from health records, and Human Phenotype Ontology terms were compared before and after diagnosis using ClinPhen. Most delays occurred between symptom onset and clinical suspicion (mean 8.17 years) rather than after suspicion (mean 1.28 years), yielding a mean total delay of 8.22 years (median 3.0). Delay decreased sharply by year of birth (r = -0.99, p < 49.92 × 10-39) and symptom onset (r = -0.96, p < 8.14 × 10-27), but showed no meaningful trend with year of diagnosis. Canonical features such as seizures, hypotonia, and stroke were frequently documented years before suspicion, underscoring missed opportunities. Diagnostic delay may reflect missed recognition rather than testing limitations. Systematic capture of early phenotypes and AI/NLP-based mining of electronic health records could proactively flag patients for reflexive sequencing, shortening diagnostic delay.
More Related Videos
15:09The Use of Primary Human Fibroblasts for Monitoring Mitochondrial Phenotypes in the Field of Parkinson's Disease
Published on: October 3, 2012
05:51Comparative Analysis of Experimental Methods to Quantify Animal Activity in Caenorhabditis elegans Models of Mitochondrial Disease
Published on: April 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are: