Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosing regimen justification using exposure-efficacy analyses in participants with
Munjal Patel1, Garrett Nieddu1, C Andrew DeRyke1
1Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract:
An exposure-efficacy analysis of the phase 3 RESTORE-IMI 2 study (NCT02493764) evaluated the relationship between plasma exposure of imipenem and relebactam and key efficacy endpoints (primary: 28-day all-cause mortality [ACM]; secondary: clinical response at early follow-up [EFU; 7-14 days after the end of treatment]) in adult participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) who received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500/500/250 mg (IMI/REL). Participants from the IMI/REL treatment group in the microbiological-modified intent-to-treat population who had pharmacokinetic (PK) data and relevant baseline pathogen susceptibility data available were included (N = 211). Previously developed population PK models were used to derive steady-state imipenem and relebactam exposures. Exposures were analyzed against the primary and secondary endpoints overall and by the most common key pathogens identified during RESTORE-IMI 2 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex, and Escherichia coli). Most participants (82.0%; n = 168/205) achieved the imipenem exposure target, and 83.9% (n = 177/211) achieved the relebactam exposure target. ACM was 16.1% overall; 11% among participants who met the imipenem exposure target, and 18% among those who met the relebactam exposure target. At EFU, 62.1% of participants experienced a favorable clinical response. Efficacy was similar across the overall exposure range and by key pathogens. There were no apparent trends in ACM rates by imipenem or relebactam exposure distributions overall or by individual key pathogens, suggesting an exposure-efficacy plateau. These results further support the recommended and currently approved IMI/REL 500/500/250 mg dosing regimen for patients with HABP/VABP.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
13:45A Precise Pathogen Delivery and Recovery System for Murine Models of Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: September 21, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...