Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.2K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.5K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.5K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent splanchnic venous thrombosis with mesenteric venous ischemia and secondary omental infarction after discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulation: A case report.

Radiology case reports·2026
Same author

Optimal MRI sequence for predicting extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: comparison of LCC and MaxRADD measurements.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Quantitative Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same author

Plastic brain mechanisms supporting reduction in cravings induced by response training.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Follow-Up of Low-Acuity Patients After Redirection From a Swiss Emergency Department Using an Electronic Triage Application: Protocol for a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Maximal radial distance for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a histopathological-radiological study.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of nuclear medicine residency training.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

ECR 2026 Book of Abstracts.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

Slow-flow, high-impact: radiologic features in venous malformations of the female genital tract.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

How to optimise breast cancer staging with contrast-enhanced mammography: current evidence and clinical implications.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

MRI-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting recurrence risk in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

Insights into imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

22.3K

Easy-to-use background score for routine prostate MRI.

Carolin Reischauer1,2, Fabio Porões3,4, Julian Vidal3,4

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland. carolin.reischauer@unifr.ch.

Insights Into Imaging
|January 26, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new binary scoring system for prostate MRI background signal intensity simplifies interpretation and aids cancer detection. This tool helps identify diagnostic uncertainties, especially for less experienced readers.

Keywords:
Background signal intensity changesDiagnosisMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasmScoring system

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.3K
Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate HoLEP.
06:04

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate HoLEP.

Published on: March 6, 2018

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

22.3K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

1.3K
Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate HoLEP.
06:04

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate HoLEP.

Published on: March 6, 2018

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Prostate MRI interpretation can be challenging due to background signal intensity variations.
  • Standardized methods are needed to assess these changes and their impact on diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a simple binary scoring system for prostate MRI background signal intensity.
  • To evaluate the system's effectiveness in cancer detection and its influence on diagnostic agreement.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 200 patients using a novel binary background scoring system (A or B).
  • Four readers independently scored background intensity and assessed cancer presence.
  • Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) were analyzed against histology.

Main Results:

  • Substantial inter-reader agreement was achieved for the background score (kappa=0.62).
  • Agreement on cancer presence was higher with score A than B.
  • High sensitivity for cancer detection was observed across scores, but specificity decreased with less experienced readers.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed binary background score offers a practical tool for evaluating peripheral zone signal changes in prostate MRI.
  • It can help communicate diagnostic uncertainties, particularly benefiting inexperienced readers.
  • Further validation is recommended for routine clinical implementation.