Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
[Comparison of outcomes between emergency surgery and conservative treatment for acute type A aortic intramural
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510100, China.
Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of emergency surgery and conservative treatment in patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). Methods: Patients with acute type A aortic IMH who were diagnosed atthe Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between November 2011 and February 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. According to international guideline criteria, patients were divided into theemergencysurgery group (surgery group) and theconservative treatment group (conservative group). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and 5-year survival after discharge were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 224 patients with acute type A aortic IMH were included. There were 138 (61.6%) and 86 (38.4%)patients underwent emergent surgery andconservative treatment, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, height, weight, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, renal insufficiency, history of cardiovascular disease, moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, or moderate to large pericardial effusion (all P>0.05). The proportions of hypertension [81.9% (113/138) vs 66.3% (57/86)] and coronary artery disease [37.0% (51/138) vs 18.6% (16/86)] were higher in the surgery group than those in the conservative group, whereas the proportions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [14.5% (20/138) vs 29.1% (25/86)], smoking history [18.1% (25/138) vs 40.7% (35/86)], Marfan syndrome [1.4% (2/138) vs 8.1% (7/86)], and bicuspid aortic valve [2.2% (3/138) vs 9.3% (8/86)] were lower in the surgery group than those in the conservative group (all P<0.05). Regarding imaging features, the prevalence of ulcer-like projection (ULP) was higher in the surgery group than that in the conservative group [44.9% (62/138) vs 29.1% (25/86), P=0.024]. In addition, ascending aortic length [12.1 (11.6, 13.4) cm vs 9.4 (8.7, 11.7) cm], maximal aortic diameter [44.8 (40.4, 50.0) mm vs 41.7 (37.5, 46.0) mm], and hematoma thickness [13.7 (11.0, 17.6) mm vs 8.0 (6.0, 9.6) mm] were all greater in the surgery group than those in the conservative group (all P<0.001). In-hospital mortality [14.0% (12/86) vs 15.9% (22/138)] and 5-year survival rate [90.1% (95%CI: 83.7%-96.9%) vs 83.5% (95%CI: 77.4%-90.1%)] did not differ significantly between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusions: The study indicates that patients in the emergency surgery group had more high-risk imaging features compared with the conservative treatment group. This suggests that for patients with acute type A aortic IMH who are clinically and radiographically stable and strictly selected, conservative treatment can achieve survival outcomes similar to surgery in the mid-term follow-up..
Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of emergency surgery and conservative treatment in patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). Methods: Patients with acute type A aortic IMH who were diagnosed atthe Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between November 2011 and February 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. According to international guideline criteria, patients were divided into theemergencysurgery group (surgery group) and theconservative treatment group (conservative group). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and 5-year survival after discharge were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 224 patients with acute type A aortic IMH were included. There were 138 (61.6%) and 86 (38.4%)patients underwent emergent surgery andconservative treatment, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, height, weight, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, renal insufficiency, history of cardiovascular disease, moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, or moderate to large pericardial effusion (all P>0.05). The proportions of hypertension [81.9% (113/138) vs 66.3% (57/86)] and coronary artery disease [37.0% (51/138) vs 18.6% (16/86)] were higher in the surgery group than those in the conservative group, whereas the proportions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [14.5% (20/138) vs 29.1% (25/86)], smoking history [18.1% (25/138) vs 40.7% (35/86)], Marfan syndrome [1.4% (2/138) vs 8.1% (7/86)], and bicuspid aortic valve [2.2% (3/138) vs 9.3% (8/86)] were lower in the surgery group than those in the conservative group (all P<0.05). Regarding imaging features, the prevalence of ulcer-like projection (ULP) was higher in the surgery group than that in the conservative group [44.9% (62/138) vs 29.1% (25/86), P=0.024]. In addition, ascending aortic length [12.1 (11.6, 13.4) cm vs 9.4 (8.7, 11.7) cm], maximal aortic diameter [44.8 (40.4, 50.0) mm vs 41.7 (37.5, 46.0) mm], and hematoma thickness [13.7 (11.0, 17.6) mm vs 8.0 (6.0, 9.6) mm] were all greater in the surgery group than those in the conservative group (all P<0.001). In-hospital mortality [14.0% (12/86) vs 15.9% (22/138)] and 5-year survival rate [90.1% (95%CI: 83.7%-96.9%) vs 83.5% (95%CI: 77.4%-90.1%)] did not differ significantly between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusions: The study indicates that patients in the emergency surgery group had more high-risk imaging features compared with the conservative treatment group. This suggests that for patients with acute type A aortic IMH who are clinically and radiographically stable and strictly selected, conservative treatment can achieve survival outcomes similar to surgery in the mid-term follow-up..
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Small Populations
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Emerging Adulthood
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...

