Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
The Role of Digit- and Pacifier-Sucking Habits on Malocclusion Development in Children: Anterior Open Bite and
Arvin Faryad1, Susana Muwaquet Rodriguez2, Tawfiq Hijazi Alsadi3
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Catholic University of Valencia (UCV), C/Quevedo, 2, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Malocclusion is one of the most prevalent oral health concerns in paediatric dentistry, with anterior open bite (AOB) and posterior crossbite (PCB) being among the most common forms. Non-nutritive sucking habits (NNSHs), including digit-sucking habits (DSHs) and pacifier-sucking habits (PSHs), have been linked to malocclusion development. While both habits are known to impact dental and skeletal development, their comparative effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the difference in the development and prevalence of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite between patients with digit-sucking and pacifier-sucking habits. Materials and Methods: An exhaustive review of the literature was conducted on the 25 November 2024 across three databases, namely EBSCOhost (including PubMed-Medline), Web of Science and Scopus. The following PICO question was constructed for the systematic review: "In children and teenagers, is there a difference in the development and prevalence of malocclusions (Anterior Open bite & Posterior Crossbite) between patients with a history of digit sucking habits and patients with a history of pacifier sucking habits?"A meta-analysis was also performed with the selected studies, and the software used to carry out the meta-analysis was R 4.3.1 (R Core Team (2023)). Results: From the initial search, 102 articles were found and a further 11 articles were obtained from manual findings. 12 articles were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of AOB and PCB was increased by both DSH and PSH. Conclusions: Both DSH and PSH significantly increased the risk of AOB and PCB. PSH posed a significantly higher risk than DSH for PCB development (OR = 2.66, p < 0.001), while no significant difference in AOB prevalence was observed between DSH and PSH (OR = 1.77, p = 0.150).
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

