The Multifaceted Role of Irisin in Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review Integrating Preclinical Evidence with...

Background: Irisin, an exercise-induced myokine, has emerged as a potent neuroprotective factor, though a systematic synthesis of its role across neurological disorders is lacking. This review systematically evaluates clinical and preclinical evidence on irisin's association with neurological diseases and its underlying mechanisms. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Twenty-one studies were included, comprising predominantly preclinical evidence (n = 14), alongside clinical observational studies (n = 6), and a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating irisin in cerebrovascular diseases, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and other neurological conditions. Eligible studies were original English-language research on irisin or FNDC5 and their neuroprotective effects, excluding reviews and studies without direct neuronal outcomes. Risk of bias was independently assessed using SYRCLE, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and RoB 2, where disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus. Results were synthesized narratively, integrating mechanistic, pre-clinical, and clinical evidence to highlight consistent neuroprotective patterns of irisin across disease categories. Results: Clinical studies consistently demonstrated that reduced circulating irisin levels predict poorer outcomes. Lower serum irisin was associated with worse functional recovery and post-stroke depression after ischemic stroke, while decreased plasma irisin in PD correlated with greater motor severity, higher α-synuclein, and reduced dopamine uptake. In AD, cerebrospinal fluid irisin levels were significantly correlated with global cognitive efficiency and specific domain performance, and correlation analyses within studies suggested a closer association with amyloid-β pathology than with markers of general neurodegeneration. However, diagnostic accuracy metrics (e.g., AUC, sensitivity, specificity) for irisin as a standalone biomarker are not yet established. Preclinical findings revealed that irisin exerts neuroprotection through multiple mechanisms: modulating microglial polarization from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation, enhancing autophagy, activating integrin αVβ5/AMPK/SIRT1 signaling, improving mitochondrial function, and reducing neuronal apoptosis. Irisin administration improved outcomes across models of stroke, PD, AD, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and epilepsy. Conclusions: Irisin represents a critical mediator linking exercise to brain health, with consistent neuroprotective effects across diverse neurological conditions. Its dual ability to combat neuroinflammation and directly protect neurons, demonstrated in preclinical models, positions it as a promising therapeutic candidate for future investigation. Future research must prioritize the resolution of fundamental methodological challenges in irisin measurement, alongside investigating pharmacokinetics and sex-specific effects, to advance irisin toward rigorous clinical evaluation.