Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma
Ryo Ohira1, Euido Nishijima, Takahiko Noro
1Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-shimbashi, Tokyo, Japan.
PréCis:
The MP-3 CII program may be useful for assessing central visual field function in mild-stage glaucoma, particularly in settings where direct structure-function mapping is desired.
Purpose:
This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the performance of the newly developed MP-3 Central Goldmann size II program by comparing its central visual field sensitivity measurements with those obtained from the Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 SITA-Standard in patients with preperimetric and mild-stage glaucoma.
Patients And Methods:
This study included 35 eyes from 26 patients with mild-stage glaucoma with macular ganglion cell analysis of optical coherence tomography abnormalities. All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations, including Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 SITA-Standard and MP-3 Central Goldmann size II visual field testing. The MP-3 Central Goldmann size II program employs a smaller Goldmann II stimulus size and a reduced number of test points compared to the HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard to enhance the detection of subtle central visual field defects.
Results:
The MP-3 Central Goldmann size II demonstrated a significantly shorter examination time compared to the HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard (278.8±45.1 seconds vs. 331.7±64.1 seconds, P<0.05). For the measurement points common to both programs, a positive correlation was observed between the two devices in hemifields corresponding to ganglion cell analysis abnormalities (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, R=0.86; P<0.05) and in the hemifield corresponding to normal ganglion cell analysis (R=0.57; P<0.05).
Conclusions:
The MP-3 Central Goldmann size II program showed strong correlation with HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard in measuring central visual field sensitivity.
More Related Videos
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
05:36Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
The Central Dogma