Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
Physician Awareness of FDA's Relaxation of REMS-Required Laboratory Testing Requirements and Changes in Prescribing
Catherine S Hwang1,2,3,4, Zhigang Lu5,6, Massimiliano Russo5,7
1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. hwangca@ohsu.edu.
Background:
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to implement Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs for certain medications that carry serious safety risks. One possible REMS requirement is routine monitoring via laboratory tests. However, in March 2020, the FDA issued a temporary enforcement discretion policy enabling prescribers to apply medical judgment for completing REMS-required laboratory testing.
Objective:
We aimed to assess whether physicians were aware of the FDA's temporary policy and if they changed their laboratory testing practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Methods:
We designed a survey of US physicians prescribing one of seven medications: ambrisentan, bosentan, clozapine, isotretinoin, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide. The study was conducted over two waves, May 2022 to October 2022 and October 2022 to January 2023. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine predictors of each outcome.
Results:
The combined response rate between the two waves of survey administration was 21%. Among 949 physician respondents, 438 (47%; 927 question respondents) reported awareness and 192 (21%; 926 question respondents) reported changing practices. Among the 438 physicians who reported awareness, 176 (40%) reported changing practices. Characteristics associated with awareness included sex (female vs male, odds ratio [OR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-2.69); recency of medical school graduation (25-34 vs ≤ 15 years, OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.81); practice setting (academic hospital vs outpatient group, OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.88); prescribing experience (≥ 21 vs ≤10 patients, OR = 2.92, 95% CI 2.06-4.14); and timing of survey completion (wave 2 vs wave 1, OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.66). Characteristics associated with practice changes included race (Asian vs White, OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-0.99) and awareness of FDA's policy (yes vs no, OR = 14.07, 95% CI 7.93-24.96), in addition to sex (female vs male, OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.31-3.01), recency of medical school graduation (≥ 35 vs < 15 years: OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93), and timing of survey completion (wave 2 vs wave 1: OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99).
Conclusions:
Although policy awareness was correlated with laboratory practice changes, fewer than half of physicians who were aware of the FDA's policy reported changing their practices.
More Related Videos
09:30Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
07:43A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions