Survivorship care guidance in a diverse cancer survivor population: Cancer Registry for Understanding and Improving Survivorship Experiences (CRUISE) Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Toxicological Assays for Testing Effects of an Epigenetic Drug on Development, Fecundity and Survivorship of Malaria Mosquitoes
Published on: January 16, 2015
Scarlett Lin Gomez1,2, Salma Shariff-Marco3,4, Alyssa Cortella4
1Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA. Scarlett.gomez@ucsf.edu.
Purpose:
Using a population-based approach, the CRUISE Study is designed to understand disparities in receipt of survivorship care guidance among medically under-resourced cancer survivors.
Methods:
Eligible participants identified from the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry were those newly diagnosed with first primary stage I-III breast or colorectal cancer. Patients from medically under-resourced communities, defined on the basis of ethnic minority group, underinsurance, and/or living in a low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhood, were oversampled. Using data derived from patient surveys, cancer registry, and geospatial linkage, patient, facility, and neighborhood attributes were assessed for associations with receipt of survivorship care guidance using univariate and multivariable log binomial regression models.
Results:
Of 867 participants (332 breast cancer, 474 colorectal cancer), 62% identified with a non-White racial/ethnic group, 20.6% resided in a low SES neighborhood, and 9.3% were uninsured or publicly insured. Overall, 72.2% received survivorship care guidance. In a multivariable model, female breast cancer survivors relative to male colorectal cancer survivors (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97), and unemployed (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.94) and retired (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95) versus employed people remained significantly less likely to receive guidance. Those who strongly agreed as well as those who disagreed that they could get medical care without financial setbacks were also significantly more likely to have received guidance than those who neither agreed nor disagreed (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.51 for strongly agreed; RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.46 for disagreed).
Conclusions:
The CRUISE Study demonstrated feasibility in accruing a population-based sample of cancer survivors with over-representation of medically under-resourced patients.
Implications For Cancer Survivors:
A high proportion received survivorship guidance, including survivorship care plans or post-treatment guidance, but some variations were found across some patient characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Cancer
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...

