Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
Published on: August 17, 2022
Effect of Additional Centralization Procedure on Intraoperative Ultrasound-Assessed Medial Meniscal Extrusion
Nobutake Ozeki1, Tomomasa Nakamura2, Yusuke Nakagawa3
1Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) contributes to knee osteoarthritis and is often caused by a medial meniscal posterior root tear (MMPRT). Although early surgical repair of MMPRT improves outcomes, MME often persists. Centralization techniques aim to reduce meniscal extrusion by anchoring the capsule to the tibial plateau; however, their clinical effectiveness when combined with MMPRT repair remains uncertain.
Purpose:
To evaluate the efficacy of centralization combined with MMPRT repair in reducing MME using intraoperative ultrasound.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
The study included 26 patients who underwent MMPRT repair with a pullout technique and centralization with three knotless anchors. Of these, 22 patients also underwent additional high tibial osteotomy. Initial tensions of 0 to 40 N were applied to the pullout repair sutures at 60° of knee flexion, and MME was measured by intraoperative ultrasound. MME was also measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of knee flexion, as well as at internally and externally rotated positions (IR and ER) at 30° and 90° of knee flexion, before MMPRT repair, after repair, and after centralization. A total of 22 patients underwent additional high tibial osteotomy after MMPRT repair and centralization.
Results:
When tension of 0 to 40 N was applied to the pullout repair sutures at 60°, the median MME decreased with increasing tension, with a significant reduction observed at 30 and 40 N compared with lower tension levels. Moreover, at tensions ≥30 N, the median MME remained <3 mm after centralization. MME was subsequently measured with 30 N tension applied to the pullout repair sutures. The median MME (mm) before MMPRT repair, after repair, and after centralization ranged from 7.6, 3.9, and 3 at 0° to 4.4, 3.5, and 2.6 at 120°, respectively. At 0°, MME was significantly smaller after centralization than before repair (P < .001) and also smaller than after repair (P < .006). At 120°, MME after centralization was significantly smaller than before repair (P < .001), and the difference among the 3 conditions was also significant (P = .03). Centralization resulted in the smallest MME at both flexion angles. The median MME before MMPRT repair, after repair, and after centralization at 30° were all smaller in the MME in the ER position. Conversely, the ER-IR differences were slight at 90°.
Conclusion:
Intraoperative ultrasound demonstrated that MMPRT repair reduced MME compared with the preoperative condition, and the addition of centralization further enhanced this reduction, yielding greater improvement than MMPRT repair alone.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair

