Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Real-World Integration of an Automated Tool for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in an Unselected Cohort of
Ronald Antulov1,2, Martin Weber Kusk1,2, Gustav Højrup Knudsen1
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospitals, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition that can be rapidly detected by non-contrast head computed tomography (NCCT). RAPID ICH is a deep learning (DL) tool for automatic ICH identification using NCCT. Our aim was to assess the real-world performance of RAPID ICH compared to that of a first-year radiology resident on consecutively acquired NCCTs from patients referred from the Emergency Department. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included NCCTs acquired on the same CT scanner over three months. Exclusion criteria were motion or metallic artifacts that substantially degraded the NCCT quality and incomplete NCCTs. Two senior neuroradiologists conducted ground-truth labeling of the NCCTs regarding ICH presence in a binary manner. The first-year radiology resident assessed NCCTs for ICH presence and was blinded to the ground-truth labeling. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed for the RAPID ICH identifications and for the first-year radiology resident's ICH identifications. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 844 NCCTs remained. Ground-truth labeling found ICH in 63 NCCTs. RAPID ICH showed 87.3% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 21.3% PPV, and 98.6% NPV, while the first-year radiology resident achieved 95.2% sensitivity, 90.8% specificity, 45.5% PPV, and 99.6% NPV. There were 8 false-negative and 203 false-positive RAPID ICH identifications. Conclusions: RAPID ICH's sensitivity and specificity were lower than in prior studies performed using RAPID ICH, and there was a high number of false-positive RAPID ICH identifications, limiting the generalizability of the assessed version of this DL tool. Testing DL tools by comparing them with radiologists of varying experience can provide valuable insights into their performance.
Related Concept Videos
Emerging Adulthood
Reliability and Validity
Work Done on a System by External Force
In the presence of a non-conservative opposing force, like friction, some part of the work done...
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Internal and External Forces
External and Internal Respiration

