Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Telehealth-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Access, and
1Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
Telehealth cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves exercise capacity and quality of life for heart failure patients, matching center-based CR and outperforming usual care. This accessible approach should be integrated into standard heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Digital Health
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) impacts millions globally, with traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) facing access barriers.
- Telehealth-based CR presents a viable alternative, necessitating updated evaluations of its effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes.
- This systematic review addresses the need for current evidence on telehealth CR's impact on HF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and assess the effectiveness, accessibility, and patient-centered outcomes of telehealth-based CR.
- To compare telehealth CR against usual care and traditional center-based CR in adults with HF.
- To synthesize evidence from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2020-2025.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
- Inclusion of RCTs comparing telehealth CR (telephone, apps, remote monitoring) with usual care or center-based CR in adult HF patients.
- Meta-analyses of exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance, peak VO2) and quality of life (QoL), alongside secondary outcomes like adherence and clinical events.
Main Results:
- Fourteen RCTs (n=7371) indicated telehealth CR significantly improved 6-minute walk distance (SMD 0.35) and quality of life (SMD 0.28) versus usual care.
- Telehealth CR demonstrated equivalence to center-based CR, with high adherence (70-92%) and patient satisfaction (75-96%).
- Some studies showed reduced hospitalizations, but no significant mortality benefits were observed.
Conclusions:
- Telehealth CR is an effective, accessible, and patient-centered intervention for heart failure management.
- It performs comparably to center-based CR and superiorly to usual care, warranting integration into standard HF care.
- Policy and technological support are crucial, though limitations include short follow-up durations and moderate trial heterogeneity.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Heart failure (HF) affects millions globally, with traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improving outcomes but facing access barriers. Telehealth-based CR offers a promising alternative, yet its effectiveness and patient-centred outcomes require updated evaluation. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness, accessibility, and patient-centred outcomes of telehealth-based CR compared with usual care or centre-based CR in adults with HF. Materials and Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials involving adults with HF receiving telehealth CR (e.g., telephone, apps, remote monitoring) compared with usual care or centre-based CR; non-RCTs and studies lacking relevant outcomes were excluded. Searches of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science identified studies published between 2020-2025. Primary outcomes were exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance [6MWD], peak VO2) and quality of life (QoL); secondary outcomes included adherence, satisfaction, and clinical events. Meta-analyses used standardized mean differences (SMD) for 6MWD and QoL. Risk of bias was assessed using PEDro, Jadad, and RoB2 tools. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials (total n = 7371 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Telehealth CR significantly improved 6MWD (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.55, p < 0.001; 6 studies) and QoL (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.46, p = 0.002; 8 studies) compared to usual care, showing equivalence to center-based CR. Adherence ranged from 70-92% and satisfaction 75-96%, and hospitalizations declined in some studies, though mortality benefits were not observed. Conclusions: Telehealth CR is effective, accessible, and patient-centred for individuals with HF, performing comparably to centre-based CR and better than usual care. It should be integrated into standard HF management, supported by policy and technology investment. Evidence is limited by short follow-up durations and moderate heterogeneity among trials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

