Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Labor Management Through Electromyometrial Imaging for Understanding Uterine Contractions
Published on: May 26, 2023
Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Underreporting of Low Back Pain in Physically Active Pregnant Women:
Luz M Gallo-Galán1, José L Gallo-Vallejo2, Juan Mozas-Moreno2,3,4,5
1Ginefiv, 28703 Madrid, Spain.
Background and Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent complications during pregnancy, with a high and variable incidence. LBP has been associated with physical inactivity, but it has not been evaluated exclusively in physically active (PA) pregnant women. This study aimed T to estimate the incidence of LBP in PA pregnant women and describe its clinical, functional, emotional, and occupational impact. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of 147 women with PA pregnancies was recruited between gestational weeks 11 and 13+6. Most (92.5%) hold a university degree. All received standardized informational intervention based on international recommendations on PA during pregnancy and LBP prevention. Data were collected through an in-person interview in the first trimester and a postpartum follow-up phone interview. PA was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ, short version), and LBP intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: LBP occurred in 64.6% of participants, despite maintaining regular PA. Pain intensity was higher in standing position (VAS = 4.9) and lower in lateral decubitus (VAS = 2.7). More than half (55.8%) did not seek medical consultation. LBP was associated with functional limitations (work, sleep, walking), emotional distress (52.6%), and work leave (30.5%; mean 9.4 weeks). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, standing occupational position showed a borderline association with LBP (OR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.00-4.55; p = 0.047), while a history of LBP in a previous pregnancy showed a statistically significant association (OR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.12-7.48; p = 0.029). Higher PA levels during pregnancy were associated with slightly lower odds of LBP (OR = 0.91 per 500 MET·min/week; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; p = 0.032), although the magnitude of this association was small. Conclusions: LBP showed a high incidence even among PA and highly educated pregnant women. More than half of the women did not seek medical consultation, suggesting potential under-recognition of LBP. Standing occupational position and a previous pregnancy-related LBP were identified as independent risk factors associated with LBP in the multivariable model. Higher PA levels were inversely associated with LBP.
Background and Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent complications during pregnancy, with a high and variable incidence. LBP has been associated with physical inactivity, but it has not been evaluated exclusively in physically active (PA) pregnant women. This study aimed T to estimate the incidence of LBP in PA pregnant women and describe its clinical, functional, emotional, and occupational impact. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of 147 women with PA pregnancies was recruited between gestational weeks 11 and 13+6. Most (92.5%) hold a university degree. All received standardized informational intervention based on international recommendations on PA during pregnancy and LBP prevention. Data were collected through an in-person interview in the first trimester and a postpartum follow-up phone interview. PA was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ, short version), and LBP intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: LBP occurred in 64.6% of participants, despite maintaining regular PA. Pain intensity was higher in standing position (VAS = 4.9) and lower in lateral decubitus (VAS = 2.7). More than half (55.8%) did not seek medical consultation. LBP was associated with functional limitations (work, sleep, walking), emotional distress (52.6%), and work leave (30.5%; mean 9.4 weeks). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, standing occupational position showed a borderline association with LBP (OR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.00-4.55; p = 0.047), while a history of LBP in a previous pregnancy showed a statistically significant association (OR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.12-7.48; p = 0.029). Higher PA levels during pregnancy were associated with slightly lower odds of LBP (OR = 0.91 per 500 MET·min/week; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; p = 0.032), although the magnitude of this association was small. Conclusions: LBP showed a high incidence even among PA and highly educated pregnant women. More than half of the women did not seek medical consultation, suggesting potential under-recognition of LBP. Standing occupational position and a previous pregnancy-related LBP were identified as independent risk factors associated with LBP in the multivariable model. Higher PA levels were inversely associated with LBP.
Related Concept Videos
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
Characteristics of Life
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Pain

