Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
The Effect of Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services on Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A
Sang Bong Ko1, Sang Gyu Kwak2, Hee Chan Kim3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu 42472, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) frequently manifests as lower leg radiating pain (LLRP), requiring selective nerve root block (SNRB). Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services (CIMS)-a multimodal program consisting of acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy-have been increasingly incorporated into clinical practice in Korea. However, randomized evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive CIMS in patients with DLSS presenting neuropathic LLRP requiring SNRB. Materials and Methods: In a single-center, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (CRIS KCT0006036), adults with DLSS (LANSS > 7; VAS > 5) were randomized 1:1 to experimental or control groups (n = 77; experimental 38, control 39). All participants received SNRB plus pharmacotherapy (limaprost, pregabalin). The experimental group additionally received CIMS, delivered eight times over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Secondary outcomes included SF-36, ODI, and RMDQ at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Repeated-measures two-factor ANOVA assessed the main effects and time × group interaction. Results: Mean VAS (experimental vs. control) was 4.73 ± 1.67 vs. 4.70 ± 1.95 at baseline; 3.74 ± 1.68 vs. 4.66 ± 1.60 at week 4; 3.93 ± 2.03 vs. 4.79 ± 1.55 at week 8; and 3.98 ± 1.98 vs. 4.98 ± 1.68 at week 12. The significant time × group interaction was identified (p = 0.040), indicating a greater pain reduction with CIMS. No significant time × group interactions were observed across SF-36 domains. Adherence to CIMS modalities was high, and no unexpected adverse events occurred. Conclusions: In DLSS patients receiving SNRB and pharmacotherapy, adjunctive CIMS resulted in greater pain reduction over 12 weeks compared with standard care alone, without introducing new safety concerns. These findings support the clinical utility of CIMS as an effective adjunctive treatment option for DLSS.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

