Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
Published on: May 31, 2013
How negative sampling shapes the performance of transcription factor binding site prediction models
Natan Tourne1, Gaetan De Waele1, Vanessa Vermeirssen2,3,4
1Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Choosing the right negative sampling method is crucial for accurate transcription factor binding site (TFBS) prediction. Genomic sampling based on positive similarity performed best, outperforming common dinucleotide shuffling techniques.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression through DNA binding.
- Predicting TF binding sites (TFBSs) is vital for understanding gene regulation and development.
- Deep learning models for TFBS prediction often use ChIP-seq data, typically treated as positive samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of various negative sampling techniques on TFBS prediction performance.
- To evaluate common negative sampling strategies, including genomic, shuffling, and neighborhood sampling.
- To highlight the critical role of negative data selection in TFBS prediction model accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Created high-quality test datasets using ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq data.
- Trained prediction models using genomic sampling, shuffling, dinucleotide shuffling, neighborhood sampling, and cell line specific sampling.
- Simulated scenarios lacking matched ATAC-seq data to assess method robustness.
Main Results:
- Performance metrics on training datasets often inflate true model performance.
- Genomic sampling of negatives, based on similarity to positives, yielded the best results among tested techniques.
- Dinucleotide shuffled negatives, a common practice, resulted in poor model performance.
Conclusions:
- The selection of negative sampling techniques significantly impacts TFBS prediction model performance.
- Careful consideration of negative data is essential for reliable TFBS prediction.
- Standard practices like dinucleotide shuffling may not be optimal for TFBS prediction.
More Related Videos
06:38High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
Published on: February 7, 2019
12:54Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
Published on: March 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Transcription Factors
Transcription Elongation Factors
The transcription elongation is regulated via pausing of RNA polymerase on several occasions during transcription. In bacteria, these halts are necessary because the transcription of DNA into mRNA is coupled to the translation of that mRNA...
Transcription Elongation Factors
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
General Transcription Factors