Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
Application of Cancer Screening Guidelines in Resource Limited Settings
Cherian Varghese1, Baridalyne Nongkynrih2, Ayush Lohiya3
1Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Cancer screening in low-resource settings faces implementation challenges due to inadequate infrastructure and differing health beliefs. Successful cancer screening requires investment in early diagnosis, treatment, and context-tailored strategies for measurable impact.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Oncology
- Health Systems Research
Background:
- Cancer screening is promoted globally, but its effectiveness is limited in low-resource settings.
- International guidelines often overlook the fragmented infrastructure and unique societal beliefs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
- Suboptimal implementation hinders the demonstrable impact of cancer screening on disease burden in under-resourced regions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine cancer screening implementation for breast, cervical, colorectal, and oral cancers in LMICs.
- To identify gaps in implementation and system preparedness based on global/national guidelines and local capacity.
- To explore the potential and challenges of emerging innovations like digital health and AI in cancer screening.
Main Methods:
- Perspective piece analyzing existing global and national cancer screening guidelines.
- Assessment of implementation challenges in LMICs, considering diagnostic, referral, and treatment capacities.
- Review of societal and health belief system differences impacting screening adoption.
Main Results:
- Significant variation exists in screening age groups, test modalities, and intervals across countries.
- Emerging technologies like AI present opportunities but also raise concerns about validation, ethics, and equitable access.
- Current implementation often fails to align evidence-based recommendations with local feasibility.
Conclusions:
- Cancer screening can be a cost-effective intervention ('best buy') only with substantial investment in early diagnosis and treatment pathways.
- Successful implementation necessitates robust system readiness and phased strategies tailored to local contexts in LMICs.
- Without adequate preparedness, large-scale screening programs risk resource misallocation without reducing disease burden.
Related Concept Videos
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Limiting Reactant
The Number e as a Limit
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve

