Global, regional and national patterns in ROP research up to the pre-COVID-19 era: A systematic bibliometric review

Juliana Palacio Varona1, Ana María Rojas Manjarres2, María Isabel Gómez-Buitrago1

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

PubMed

Insights

Research on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a cause of childhood blindness, is concentrated in high-income countries. Global disparities persist in ROP research output and impact, highlighting the need for increased capacity in underrepresented regions.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Public Health
  • Bibliometrics

Background:

  • Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a primary cause of preventable childhood blindness, disproportionately affecting preterm infants.
  • Global disparities in neonatal care and research infrastructure create inequities in ROP scientific production and visibility.
  • Understanding these global patterns is crucial for addressing ROP worldwide.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and characterize global, regional, and national research patterns on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) from 1950 to 2020.
  • To analyze temporal trends, geographic distribution, thematic focus, and citation impact of ROP research.
  • To identify disparities in ROP research output and visibility across different global regions.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic bibliometric review was conducted using data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO.
  • A total of 4,932 eligible articles published between 1950 and 2020 were analyzed.
  • Analysis included publication volume, geographic origin, research themes, and citation impact.

Main Results:

  • The majority of ROP research originated from the Region of the Americas (44.2%), Europe (28.0%), and the Western Pacific (16.0%).
  • High-income countries produced 73.4% of the research, with significant underrepresentation from lower-income nations.
  • Key research themes included risk/protective factors (25.0%) and treatment/outcomes (23.5%), while surveillance and public health policy studies were scarce (6.3%).
  • Scientific output surged post-1980s, with recent rapid growth in Asia.
  • Citation analysis revealed significant regional inequalities, with high-income regions dominating global citations and per-article impact.

Conclusions:

  • ROP research is heavily concentrated in high-income countries, reflecting global disparities in scientific production and visibility.
  • Strengthening research capacity in underrepresented regions is vital for equitable evidence generation.
  • Addressing these disparities is essential for informed global eye health decision-making and ROP prevention efforts.

Related Concept Videos

Global Climate Change01:50

Global Climate Change

Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
28.9K
National Nursing Organizations I01:26

National Nursing Organizations I

Nursing organizations assume a significant role in consistently developing the nursing profession through education, research studies, establishing practice standards, and reforming health policies. Typically, nursing organizations operate at the regional, national, and international levels. For example, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) represents more than 28 million nurses worldwide. In contrast, the American Nurses Association (ANA) is a membership organization representing nurses...
3.0K
National Nursing Organizations II01:30

National Nursing Organizations II

Nursing organizations play a vital role in representing nurses working in specialized clinical settings, such as the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN).
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
2.0K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K